Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction

[Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Pau Monne
> Sent: 13 April 2018 20:53
> To: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Smith
> <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Alexey G <x1917x@xxxxxxxxx>; Stefano
> Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>; Paul
> Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>; Christopher Clark
> <christopher.w.clark@xxxxxxxxx>; Rich Persaud <persaur@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
> 
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:59:15PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 13/04/2018, 11:01, "Roger Pau Monne" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >     On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >     >    may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those
> time-slots.
> >     >     >    Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the 
> > following
> week.
> >     >     >    If you could fill out the following Google poll, if this 
> > week works
> that
> >     >     >    would be great. Otherwise please scream.
> >     >
> >     >     I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, 
> > so I
> >     >     won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week
> after.
> >     >     Let's see what people think of the current dates.
> >     >
> >     >     Roger.
> >     >
> >     > Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been
> invalidated.
> >     >
> >     > See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n
> >
> >     Thanks! I've already fixed my vote.
> >
> >     I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items
> >     because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely
> >     different (albeit all related to PCI).
> >
> > Royger: I am OK with trying to get a draft agenda in place in this e-mail
> thread. But I can't drive this, as I don’t understand the issues. But I am 
> happy
> to collate everything as for the x86 call and write up minutes
> 
> On the x86 side:
> 
>  - Q35 HVM emulation, adding MCFG support to guests.

One of the issues here is support for multiple external emulators w.r.t. config 
space access.

>  - PVH guest pci-passthrough: using the internal vPCI infrastructure.

Let's not distinguish between HVM or PVH here. We want to use the same 
passthrough mechanisms for both.

Cheers,

  Paul

> 
> At least that I can think of ATM.
> 
> Roger.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel