[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Input: xen-kbdfront - allow better run-time configuration
On 04/19/2018 04:19 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: On 19/04/18 15:12, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:On 04/19/2018 04:10 PM, Jason Andryuk wrote:On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Ok, so I'll send v2 with the following changes: diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c index a3306aad40b0..d8cca212f737 100644 --- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c +++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c @@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ module_param_array(ptr_size, int, NULL, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(ptr_size, "Pointing device width, height in pixels (default 800,600)"); -static unsigned int no_ptr_dev; -module_param(no_ptr_dev, uint, 0); +static bool no_ptr_dev; +module_param(no_ptr_dev, bool, 0); MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_ptr_dev, "If set then no virtual pointing device exposed to the guest"); -static unsigned int no_kbd_dev; -module_param(no_kbd_dev, uint, 0); +static bool no_kbd_dev; +module_param(no_kbd_dev, bool, 0); MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_kbd_dev, "If set then no virtual keyboard device exposed to the guest");I prefer direct logic over inverse logic. Maybe just use kbd_dev, default to true, but allow it to be set off? static bool kbd_dev = true; module_param(kbd_dev, bool, 0);I have no preference here, either way works for me Juergen, what do you think about the above?I really have no preference here. What should be taken into account is that boolean parameters don't need a value, meaning "true" in that case. This would make no sense for "kbd_dev" as it wouldn't change the default. Then I'll go with the diff above, e.g. boolean no_{kbd|ptr})dev Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |