[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] x86: Fix possible ASSERT(cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
From: David Wang <davidwang@xxxxxxxxxxx> CPUs may share an in-use channel. Hence clearing of a bit from the cpumask (in hpet_broadcast_exit()) as well as setting one (in hpet_broadcast_enter()) must not race evaluation of that same cpumask. Therefore avoid evaluating the cpumask twice in hpet_detach_channel(). Otherwise cpumask_empty() may e.g.return false while the subsequent cpumask_first() could return nr_cpu_ids, which then triggers the assertion in cpumask_of() reached through set_channel_irq_affinity(). Signed-off-by: David Wang <davidwang@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/x86/hpet.c | 24 +++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hpet.c b/xen/arch/x86/hpet.c index bc7a851..18447db 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hpet.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hpet.c @@ -509,6 +509,8 @@ static void hpet_attach_channel(unsigned int cpu, static void hpet_detach_channel(unsigned int cpu, struct hpet_event_channel *ch) { + unsigned int next; + spin_lock_irq(&ch->lock); ASSERT(ch == per_cpu(cpu_bc_channel, cpu)); @@ -517,17 +519,21 @@ static void hpet_detach_channel(unsigned int cpu, if ( cpu != ch->cpu ) spin_unlock_irq(&ch->lock); - else if ( cpumask_empty(ch->cpumask) ) - { - ch->cpu = -1; - clear_bit(HPET_EVT_USED_BIT, &ch->flags); - spin_unlock_irq(&ch->lock); - } else { - ch->cpu = cpumask_first(ch->cpumask); - set_channel_irq_affinity(ch); - local_irq_enable(); + next = cpumask_first(ch->cpumask); + if( next >= nr_cpu_ids ) + { + ch->cpu = -1; + clear_bit(HPET_EVT_USED_BIT, &ch->flags); + spin_unlock_irq(&ch->lock); + } + else + { + ch->cpu = next; + set_channel_irq_affinity(ch); + local_irq_enable(); + } } } -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |