[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/kbdif: Add features to control keyboard and pointer
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 09:58:11AM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> > > It is now not fully possible to control if and which virtual devices > are created by the frontend, e.g. keyboard and pointer devices > are always created and multi-touch device is created if the s/is/are/ > backend advertises multi-touch support. In some cases this Can you mention under which backend node those devices appear? > behavior is not desirable and better control over the frontend's > configuration is required. > > Add new XenStore feature fields, so it is possible to individually > control set of exposed virtual devices for each guest OS: > - set feature-keyboard to 0 if no keyboard device needs to be created > - set feature-pointer to 0 if no pointer device needs to be created I am thinking that this should be just called 'feature-disable-keyboard' or such. And it being there in the first place would signify '1' by default? > > Keep old behavior by default. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/include/public/io/kbdif.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/xen/include/public/io/kbdif.h b/xen/include/public/io/kbdif.h > index 3ce54e9a44c1..ac92e466fd9c 100644 > --- a/xen/include/public/io/kbdif.h > +++ b/xen/include/public/io/kbdif.h > @@ -49,7 +49,22 @@ > * > * Capable backend advertises supported features by publishing > * corresponding entries in XenStore and puts 1 as the value of the entry. > - * If a feature is not supported then 0 must be set or feature entry omitted. > + * If not otherwise noted if a feature is not supported then 0 must be set > + * or feature entry omitted. Huh? I am not sure what you are saying there. > + * > + * feature-keyboard > + * Values: <uint> > + * > + * If no virtual keyboard device to be exposed by the frontend then > + * this must be set to 0. If feature entry omitted or not set its > + * value defaults to 1. Are you saying: "If there is no need to expose a virtual keyboard device then this must be set to 0. By default it is 1 and it is assumed that any frontend that does not probe this flag will assume the value of 1. "? > + * > + * feature-pointer > + * Values: <uint> > + * > + * If no virtual pointer device to be exposed by the frontend then > + * this must be set to 0. If feature entry omitted or not set its > + * value defaults to 1. Ditto? > * > * feature-abs-pointer > * Values: <uint> > @@ -177,6 +192,8 @@ > > #define XENKBD_DRIVER_NAME "vkbd" > > +#define XENKBD_FIELD_FEAT_KEYBOARD "feature-keyboard" > +#define XENKBD_FIELD_FEAT_POINTER "feature-pointer" How about just call it ' feature-disable-keyboard feature-disable-keyboard > #define XENKBD_FIELD_FEAT_ABS_POINTER "feature-abs-pointer" > #define XENKBD_FIELD_FEAT_MTOUCH "feature-multi-touch" > #define XENKBD_FIELD_REQ_ABS_POINTER "request-abs-pointer" > -- > 2.17.0 > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |