[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] SVM: re-work VMCB sync-ing
>>> On 30.04.18 at 17:30, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/30/2018 07:37 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> @@ -1168,6 +1169,9 @@ static void noreturn svm_do_resume(struc >> >> hvm_do_resume(v); >> >> + if ( v->arch.hvm_svm.vmcb_sync_state == vmcb_needs_vmload ) >> + svm_sync_vmcb(v, vmcb_needs_vmsave); > > > Is it not possible (or advisable) to move the test into svm_sync_vmcb() > (and drop the ASSERT there)? It is possible; I'm not sure myself if it's advisable, but I take you asking the question as you thinking it is, so I'll change it. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |