[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 74663: all pass

[Platform Team regression test user <citrix-osstest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This run is configured for baseline tests only.

flight 74663 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/74663/

Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
 ovmf                 3ff82ee5fc52c8e8764b407ec45cafab8452e2b9
baseline version:
 ovmf                 19f21ed91652d2a5160426ad8ca9219728d85aec

Last test of basis    74662  2018-05-02 20:48:34 Z    0 days
Testing same since    74663  2018-05-03 05:18:26 Z    0 days    1 attempts

------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
  Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>

jobs:
 build-amd64-xsm                                              pass    
 build-i386-xsm                                               pass    
 build-amd64                                                  pass    
 build-i386                                                   pass    
 build-amd64-libvirt                                          pass    
 build-i386-libvirt                                           pass    
 build-amd64-pvops                                            pass    
 build-i386-pvops                                             pass    
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64                         pass    
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64                          pass    


------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.xs.citrite.net
logs: /home/osstest/logs
images: /home/osstest/images

Logs, config files, etc. are available at
    http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs

Test harness code can be found at
    http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary


Push not applicable.

------------------------------------------------------------
commit 3ff82ee5fc52c8e8764b407ec45cafab8452e2b9
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Apr 19 04:33:14 2018 +0800

    SecurityPkg/UserProfileManagerDxe: Update RouteConfig function
    
    According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
    the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration.  This patch
    ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
    
    Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 546603d39d9a33a216d5a09a167a465b756b7704
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Apr 19 04:33:13 2018 +0800

    SecurityPkg/UserIdentifyManagerDxe: Update RouteConfig function
    
    According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
    the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration.  This patch
    ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
    
    Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx>

commit b59ac35e7ac6bb6e46d73beae63dbfd5cb1d6d29
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Apr 19 04:33:12 2018 +0800

    SecurityPkg/PwdCredentialProviderDxe: Update RouteConfig function
    
    According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
    the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration.  This patch
    ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
    
    Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx>

commit efa5343a23e1d72a80deb463259756ac86ae1632
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Apr 19 04:33:11 2018 +0800

    SecurityPkg/Tcg2Config: Update RouteConfig function
    
    According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
    the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration.  This patch
    ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
    
    Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 54b7f3cfc1b46a645fb2ff03bce3a00a7c8a784e
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Apr 19 04:32:27 2018 +0800

    MdeModulePkg/DriverHealthManagerDxe: Update RouteConfig function
    
    According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
    the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration.  This patch
    ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
    
    Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 124b18cfb3ff20d7a51ca87143605da9c54b86c9
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Apr 19 04:32:26 2018 +0800

    MdeModulePkg/RamDiskDxe: Update RouteConfig function
    
    According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
    the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration.  This patch
    ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
    
    Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx>

commit e00cd9559095b3146c8349210137fd9fb6dc0edc
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Apr 19 04:32:25 2018 +0800

    MdeModulePkg/UiApp: Update RouteConfig function
    
    According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
    the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration.  This patch
    ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
    
    Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx>

commit a82385958e6e5ffe8151ad71f0a47cb06e2d5b20
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Apr 19 04:31:35 2018 +0800

    IntelFrameworkModulePkg/LegacyBootMaintUiLib: Update RouteConfig function
    
    According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
    the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration.  This patch
    ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
    
    Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@xxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel