Re: [Xen-devel] staging-4.6 seems to be broken

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: staging-4.6 seems to be broken"):
> On 11.05.18 at 17:02, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.6-testing test] 122657: regressions - 
...
> > At least some of these are surely real regressions.
> 
> Are you saying that just because of the amount of failures above, or
> because of some observations from log files or alike? I'm asking because
> 122699 looks quite a bit better.

The former.

And yes, 122699 does look better.  This is concerning.  I wonder what
the trouble can have been with 122657.

There have been a number of problems with some test hosts (which are
causing lots of fallout), but that's not what's wrong with 122657.

Hrrrm.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel