[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/31] pmstat: move pmstat.c file to the xen/drivers/pm/stat.c location
>>> On 18.05.18 at 13:14, <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 6:36 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On 09.11.17 at 18:09, <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> +int acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 acpi_id, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(uint32) pdc) >>> +{ >>> + u32 bits[3]; >>> + int ret; >>> + >>> + if ( copy_from_guest(bits, pdc, 2) ) >>> + ret = -EFAULT; >>> + else if ( bits[0] != ACPI_PDC_REVISION_ID || !bits[1] ) >>> + ret = -EINVAL; >>> + else if ( copy_from_guest_offset(bits + 2, pdc, 2, 1) ) >>> + ret = -EFAULT; >>> + else >>> + { >>> + u32 mask = 0; >>> + >>> + if ( xen_processor_pmbits & XEN_PROCESSOR_PM_CX ) >>> + mask |= ACPI_PDC_C_MASK | ACPI_PDC_SMP_C1PT; >>> + if ( xen_processor_pmbits & XEN_PROCESSOR_PM_PX ) >>> + mask |= ACPI_PDC_P_MASK | ACPI_PDC_SMP_C1PT; >>> + if ( xen_processor_pmbits & XEN_PROCESSOR_PM_TX ) >>> + mask |= ACPI_PDC_T_MASK | ACPI_PDC_SMP_C1PT; >>> + bits[2] &= (ACPI_PDC_C_MASK | ACPI_PDC_P_MASK | ACPI_PDC_T_MASK | >>> + ACPI_PDC_SMP_C1PT) & ~mask; >>> + ret = arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(acpi_id, bits, mask); >>> + } >>> + if ( !ret && __copy_to_guest_offset(pdc, 2, bits + 2, 1) ) >>> + ret = -EFAULT; >>> + >>> + return ret; >>> +} >> >> Looks quite ACPI-specific. > Yes, current patch does just a movement. > > Next patch [1] wraps it in #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI. > > However during patch discussion we decided to move this function to arch/x86. > It is called from arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c and pulls a bunch of > #define-s from pdc_intel.h Not sure - the function may be used by x86 only right now, but is what it does really x86-specific? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |