[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/XPTI: fix S3 resume (and CPU offlining in general)
Andrew Cooper: > On 24/05/18 15:14, Simon Gaiser wrote: >> Jan Beulich: >>>>>> On 24.05.18 at 16:00, <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Jan Beulich: >>>>> In commit d1d6fc97d6 ("x86/xpti: really hide almost all of Xen image") >>>>> I've failed to remember the fact that multiple CPUs share a stub >>>>> mapping page. Therefore it is wrong to unconditionally zap the mapping >>>>> when bringing down a CPU; it may only be unmapped when no other online >>>>> CPU uses that same page. >>>>> >>>>> Reported-by: Simon Gaiser <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c >>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c >>>>> @@ -876,7 +876,21 @@ static void cleanup_cpu_root_pgt(unsigne >>>>> >>>>> free_xen_pagetable(rpt); >>>>> >>>>> - /* Also zap the stub mapping for this CPU. */ >>>>> + /* >>>>> + * Also zap the stub mapping for this CPU, if no other online one >>>>> uses >>>>> + * the same page. >>>>> + */ >>>>> + if ( stub_linear ) >>>>> + { >>>>> + unsigned int other; >>>>> + >>>>> + for_each_online_cpu(other) >>>>> + if ( !((per_cpu(stubs.addr, other) ^ stub_linear) >> >>>>> PAGE_SHIFT) ) >>>>> + { >>>>> + stub_linear = 0; >>>>> + break; >>>>> + } >>>>> + } >>>>> if ( stub_linear ) >>>>> { >>>>> l3_pgentry_t *l3t = l4e_to_l3e(common_pgt); >>>> Tried this on-top of staging (fc5805daef) and I still get the same >>>> double fault. >>> Hmm, it worked for me offlining (and later re-onlining) several pCPU-s. What >>> size a system are you testing on? Mine has got only 12 CPUs, i.e. all stubs >>> are in the same page (and I'd never unmap anything here at all). >> 4 cores + HT, so 8 CPUs from Xen's PoV. > > Can you try with the "x86/traps: Dump the instruction stream even for > double faults" patch I've just posted, and show the full #DF panic log > please? (Its conceivable that there are multiple different issues here.) With Jan's and your patch: (XEN) mce_intel.c:782: MCA Capability: firstbank 0, extended MCE MSR 0, BCAST, CMCI (XEN) CPU0 CMCI LVT vector (0xf2) already installed (XEN) Finishing wakeup from ACPI S3 state. (XEN) Enabling non-boot CPUs ... (XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v1 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from 0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00000 (XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v1 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from 0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00800 (XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v2 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from 0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00000 (XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v2 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from 0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00800 (XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v3 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from 0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00000 (XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v3 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from 0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00800 (XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v4 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from 0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00000 (XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v4 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from 0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00800 (XEN) *** DOUBLE FAULT *** (XEN) ----[ Xen-4.11-rc x86_64 debug=y Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 0 (XEN) RIP: e008:[<ffff82d08037b964>] handle_exception+0x9c/0xff (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000010006 CONTEXT: hypervisor (XEN) rax: ffffc90040ce40d8 rbx: 0000000000000000 rcx: 0000000000000003 (XEN) rdx: 0000000000000000 rsi: 0000000000000000 rdi: 0000000000000000 (XEN) rbp: 000036ffbf31bf07 rsp: ffffc90040ce4000 r8: 0000000000000000 (XEN) r9: 0000000000000000 r10: 0000000000000000 r11: 0000000000000000 (XEN) r12: 0000000000000000 r13: 0000000000000000 r14: ffffc90040ce7fff (XEN) r15: 0000000000000000 cr0: 000000008005003b cr4: 0000000000042660 (XEN) cr3: 000000022200a000 cr2: ffffc90040ce3ff8 (XEN) fsb: 00007fa9e7909740 gsb: ffff88021e740000 gss: 0000000000000000 (XEN) ds: 002b es: 002b fs: 0000 gs: 0000 ss: e010 cs: e008 (XEN) Xen code around <ffff82d08037b964> (handle_exception+0x9c/0xff): (XEN) 00 f3 90 0f ae e8 eb f9 <e8> 07 00 00 00 f3 90 0f ae e8 eb f9 83 e9 01 75 (XEN) Current stack base ffffc90040ce0000 differs from expected ffff8300cec88000 (XEN) Valid stack range: ffffc90040ce6000-ffffc90040ce8000, sp=ffffc90040ce4000, tss.rsp0=ffff8300cec8ffa0 (XEN) No stack overflow detected. Skipping stack trace. (XEN) (XEN) **************************************** (XEN) Panic on CPU 0: (XEN) DOUBLE FAULT -- system shutdown (XEN) **************************************** (XEN) (XEN) Reboot in five seconds... Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |