[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] xen/gntdev: Allow mappings for DMA buffers
On 06/07/2018 12:19 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 06/06/2018 04:14 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:On 06/04/2018 11:12 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:On 06/01/2018 07:41 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: @@ -121,8 +146,27 @@ static void gntdev_free_map(struct grant_map *map) if (map == NULL) return; +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC *Option 1: kfree(map->frames);* + if (map->dma_vaddr) { + struct gnttab_dma_alloc_args args; + + args.dev = map->dma_dev; + args.coherent = map->dma_flags & GNTDEV_DMA_FLAG_COHERENT; + args.nr_pages = map->count; + args.pages = map->pages; + args.frames = map->frames; + args.vaddr = map->dma_vaddr; + args.dev_bus_addr = map->dma_bus_addr; + + gnttab_dma_free_pages(&args); *Option 2: kfree(map->frames);* + } else +#endif if (map->pages) gnttab_free_pages(map->count, map->pages); + +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC + kfree(map->frames); +#endif Can this be done under if (map->dma_vaddr) ? In other words, is it possible for dma_vaddr to be NULL and still have unallocated frames pointer?It is possible to have vaddr == NULL and frames != NULL as we allocate frames outside of gnttab_dma_alloc_pages which may fail. Calling kfree on NULL pointer is safe,I am not questioning safety of the code, I would like avoid another ifdef. Ah, I now understand, so you are asking if we can have that kfree(map->frames); in the place *Option 2* I marked above. Unfortunately no: map->frames is allocated before we try to allocate DMA memory, e.g. before dma_vaddr is set: [...] add->frames = kcalloc(count, sizeof(add->frames[0]), GFP_KERNEL); if (!add->frames) goto err; [...] if (gnttab_dma_alloc_pages(&args)) goto err; add->dma_vaddr = args.vaddr; [...] err: gntdev_free_map(add); So, it is possible to enter gntdev_free_map with frames != NULL and dma_vaddr == NULL. Option 1 above cannot be used as map->frames is needed for gnttab_dma_free_pages(&args); and Option 2 cannot be used as frames != NULL and dma_vaddr == NULL. Thus, I think that unfortunately we need that #ifdef. Option 3 below can also be considered, but that seems to be not good as we free resources in different places which looks inconsistent. Sorry if I'm still missing your point. so I see no reason to change this code.kfree(map->pages); kfree(map->grants); kfree(map->map_ops); @@ -132,7 +176,8 @@ static void gntdev_free_map(struct grant_map *map) kfree(map); } -static struct grant_map *gntdev_alloc_map(struct gntdev_priv *priv, int count) +static struct grant_map *gntdev_alloc_map(struct gntdev_priv *priv, int count, + int dma_flags) { struct grant_map *add; int i; @@ -155,6 +200,37 @@ static struct grant_map *gntdev_alloc_map(struct gntdev_priv *priv, int count) NULL == add->pages) goto err; +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC + add->dma_flags = dma_flags; + + /* + * Check if this mapping is requested to be backed + * by a DMA buffer. + */ + if (dma_flags & (GNTDEV_DMA_FLAG_WC | GNTDEV_DMA_FLAG_COHERENT)) { + struct gnttab_dma_alloc_args args; + + add->frames = kcalloc(count, sizeof(add->frames[0]), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!add->frames) + goto err; + + /* Remember the device, so we can free DMA memory. */ + add->dma_dev = priv->dma_dev; + + args.dev = priv->dma_dev; + args.coherent = dma_flags & GNTDEV_DMA_FLAG_COHERENT; + args.nr_pages = count; + args.pages = add->pages; + args.frames = add->frames; + + if (gnttab_dma_alloc_pages(&args)) *Option 3: kfree(map->frames);* + goto err; + + add->dma_vaddr = args.vaddr; + add->dma_bus_addr = args.dev_bus_addr; + } else +#endif if (gnttab_alloc_pages(count, add->pages)) goto err; @@ -325,6 +401,14 @@ static int map_grant_pages(struct grant_map *map) map->unmap_ops[i].handle = map->map_ops[i].handle; if (use_ptemod) map->kunmap_ops[i].handle = map->kmap_ops[i].handle; +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC + else if (map->dma_vaddr) { + unsigned long mfn; + + mfn = __pfn_to_mfn(page_to_pfn(map->pages[i]));Not pfn_to_mfn()?I'd love to, but pfn_to_mfn is only defined for x86, not ARM: [1] and [2] Thus, drivers/xen/gntdev.c:408:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pfn_to_mfn’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] mfn = pfn_to_mfn(page_to_pfn(map->pages[i])); So, I'll keep __pfn_to_mfnHow will this work on non-PV x86? So, you mean I need: #ifdef CONFIG_X86 mfn = pfn_to_mfn(page_to_pfn(map->pages[i])); #else mfn = __pfn_to_mfn(page_to_pfn(map->pages[i])); #endif -boris Thank you, Oleksandr _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |