[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/3] xen: Sync up with the canonical protocol definitions in Xen
On 13/06/18 08:13, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > On 06/13/2018 09:11 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> On June 12, 2018 10:49:31 PM PDT, Oleksandr Andrushchenko >> <andr2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 06/13/2018 02:40 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:46:10PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>> On 12/06/18 09:48, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >>>>>> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the sync up with the canonical definitions of the input, >>>>>> sound and display protocols in Xen. >>>>>> >>>>>> Changes to kbdif: >>>>>> 1. Add missing string constants for {feature|request}-raw-pointer >>>>>> to align with the rest of the interface file. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. Add new XenStore feature fields, so it is possible to >>> individually >>>>>> control set of exposed virtual devices for each guest OS: >>>>>> - set feature-disable-keyboard to 1 if no keyboard device >>> needs >>>>>> to be created >>>>>> - set feature-disable-pointer to 1 if no pointer device needs >>>>>> to be created >>>>>> >>>>>> 3. Move multi-touch device parameters to backend nodes: these are >>>>>> described as a part of frontend's XenBus configuration nodes >>>>>> while they belong to backend's configuration. Fix this by >>> moving >>>>>> the parameters to the proper section. >>>>>> >>>>>> Unique-id field: >>>>>> 1. Add unique-id XenBus entry for virtual input and display. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. Change type of unique-id field to string for sndif to align with >>>>>> display and input protocols. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko >>> <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> I'm fine with this patch being added via the input tree with the >>> other >>>>> patches. In case I should take it via the Xen tree, please send me a >>>>> note. >>>> Juergen, >>>> >>>> I created an immutable branch off v4.17 with these 3 patches in case >>> you >>>> would want to merge them into your tree without waiting for them to >>>> appear in mainline: >>>> >>>> git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input.git >>> ib/4.17-xen-kbdfront-runtime-config >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>> Thank you, >>> I would prefer the fastest path of course >> It will be part of 4.19 pull request; the immutable branch is for >> Juergen if he does not want to wait till 4.19 merge window to get the >> changes. > Ah, I see. Juergen, can we please merge this via Xen tree then which > I assume will be faster? As Dmitry has it already queued in the input tree I think this is fine. I trust him to take the right decision for which kernel version those patches are to be queued. They belong to the input tree after all. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |