Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 08/15] x86/cpu: Remove loop form vmce_save_vcpu_ctxt() func

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 21.06.18 at 09:47, <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jo, 2018-06-21 at 01:39 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 20.06.18 at 10:56, <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > So the final plan for the series is like this:
>> > - Base everything on Roger's series
>> > - Keep patches 1-7
>> > - Have patch 8 add an extra arg to HVM_REGISTER_SAVE_RESTORE
>> > and hvm_sr_handlers
>> > - Have patch 9 like the patch 15 form now and have it call the
>> > save_one handlers
>> > - Have the next patches remove the redundant save handlers and
>> > rename the save one
>> > - The final patch should remove the extra arg. This one can be
>> > kept or not.
>> Sounds reasonable, albeit I have to admit I'm not sure what the last
>> sentence is supposed to mean. Either it is possible to eliminate the
>> extra arg, then you should do so, or it is not possible (in which
>> case
>> you can't possibly add a respective patch to the series).
> 
> I wanted to say that the last patch will be independent and it can go
> upstream or not because you said that you are not sure if the extra
> args should be removed or not.

I did not say "should" but "could" (in other words of course).

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel