|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 06/11] x86/hvm: Introduce hvm_save_mtrr_msr_one func
>>> On 25.07.18 at 14:14, <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is used to save data from a single instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> Changes since v11:
> - hvm_save_mtrr_msr() now returns err from hvm_save_mtrr_msr_one().
>
> Note: This patch is based on Roger Pau Monne's series[1]
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c | 81
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c
> index 48facbb..47a5c29 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c
> @@ -718,52 +718,59 @@ int hvm_set_mem_pinned_cacheattr(struct domain *d,
> uint64_t gfn_start,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int hvm_save_mtrr_msr(struct domain *d, hvm_domain_context_t *h)
> +static int hvm_save_mtrr_msr_one(struct vcpu *v, hvm_domain_context_t *h)
> {
> - struct vcpu *v;
> + const struct mtrr_state *mtrr_state = &v->arch.hvm_vcpu.mtrr;
> + struct hvm_hw_mtrr hw_mtrr = {
> + .msr_mtrr_def_type = mtrr_state->def_type |
> + MASK_INSR(mtrr_state->fixed_enabled,
> + MTRRdefType_FE) |
> + MASK_INSR(mtrr_state->enabled, MTRRdefType_E),
> + .msr_mtrr_cap = mtrr_state->mtrr_cap,
> + };
> + unsigned int i;
>
> - /* save mtrr&pat */
> - for_each_vcpu(d, v)
> + if ( MASK_EXTR(hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_cap, MTRRcap_VCNT) >
> + (ARRAY_SIZE(hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_var) / 2) )
> {
> - const struct mtrr_state *mtrr_state = &v->arch.hvm_vcpu.mtrr;
> - struct hvm_hw_mtrr hw_mtrr = {
> - .msr_mtrr_def_type = mtrr_state->def_type |
> - MASK_INSR(mtrr_state->fixed_enabled,
> - MTRRdefType_FE) |
> - MASK_INSR(mtrr_state->enabled,
> MTRRdefType_E),
> - .msr_mtrr_cap = mtrr_state->mtrr_cap,
> - };
> - unsigned int i;
> + dprintk(XENLOG_G_ERR,
> + "HVM save: %pv: too many (%lu) variable range MTRRs\n",
> + v, MASK_EXTR(hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_cap, MTRRcap_VCNT));
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> - if ( MASK_EXTR(hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_cap, MTRRcap_VCNT) >
> - (ARRAY_SIZE(hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_var) / 2) )
> - {
> - dprintk(XENLOG_G_ERR,
> - "HVM save: %pv: too many (%lu) variable range MTRRs\n",
> - v, MASK_EXTR(hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_cap, MTRRcap_VCNT));
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + hvm_get_guest_pat(v, &hw_mtrr.msr_pat_cr);
>
> - hvm_get_guest_pat(v, &hw_mtrr.msr_pat_cr);
> + for ( i = 0; i < MASK_EXTR(hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_cap, MTRRcap_VCNT); i++ )
> + {
> + /* save physbase */
> + hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_var[i*2] =
> + ((uint64_t*)mtrr_state->var_ranges)[i*2];
> + /* save physmask */
> + hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_var[i*2+1] =
> + ((uint64_t*)mtrr_state->var_ranges)[i*2+1];
> + }
As you move/re-indent code, please fix obvious style violations
(here: missing blanks around binary operators). It also would be
really nice if you got rid of the ugly and risky casts, and used
the actual structure fields instead.
> - for ( i = 0; i < MASK_EXTR(hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_cap, MTRRcap_VCNT); i++ )
> - {
> - /* save physbase */
> - hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_var[i*2] =
> - ((uint64_t*)mtrr_state->var_ranges)[i*2];
> - /* save physmask */
> - hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_var[i*2+1] =
> - ((uint64_t*)mtrr_state->var_ranges)[i*2+1];
> - }
> + for ( i = 0; i < NUM_FIXED_MSR; i++ )
> + hw_mtrr.msr_mtrr_fixed[i] =
> + ((uint64_t*)mtrr_state->fixed_ranges)[i];
Whereas here I think you would best simply use memcpy(), again
to get rid of the cast.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |