[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/9] x86: enclose hypercall page initialisation code in CONFIG_{HVM, PV}
>>> On 07.08.18 at 18:08, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 04:44:13AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 07.08.18 at 12:00, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c >> > @@ -352,12 +352,19 @@ void subarch_percpu_traps_init(void) >> > void hypercall_page_initialise(struct domain *d, void *hypercall_page) >> > { >> > memset(hypercall_page, 0xCC, PAGE_SIZE); >> > +#if CONFIG_HVM >> > if ( is_hvm_domain(d) ) >> > hvm_hypercall_page_initialise(d, hypercall_page); >> > - else if ( !is_pv_32bit_domain(d) ) >> > - hypercall_page_initialise_ring3_kernel(hypercall_page); >> > - else >> > - hypercall_page_initialise_ring1_kernel(hypercall_page); >> > +#endif >> > +#if CONFIG_PV >> > + if ( is_pv_domain(d) ) >> > + { >> > + if ( !is_pv_32bit_domain(d) ) >> > + hypercall_page_initialise_ring3_kernel(hypercall_page); >> > + else >> > + hypercall_page_initialise_ring1_kernel(hypercall_page); >> > + } >> > +#endif >> > } >> >> I'm not convinced: This is uglier to read, and things like is_hvm_domain() >> should evaluate to constant false anyway without the respective >> CONFIG_* setting enabled. > > I take it you are against adding CONFIG_* here? > > The addition of is_pv_domain branch is still needed because both sets > might get compiled out. But that can be done by making the sequence if ( is_hvm_... ) else if ( is_pv_32bit_... ) else if ( is_pv_... ) I.e. in particular without any changes to the nesting. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |