[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/dmar: zap DMAR signature for dom0 once in TBOOT case
When TBOOT enabled, acpi_parse_dmar() zap a copy of DMAR table rather than the real table, so make it controled by config option based on the fact that we already have done the real zapping in tboot_parse_dmar_table(). As said above, acpi_parse_dmar() doesn't zaps APCI DMAR signature in real TXT heap table, fix the stale comments. This is osmetic change, it's unnecessory to zap a copy of DMAR table which is freed later. -v2: Add some description per Jan. Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@xxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/x86/tboot.c | 3 +-- xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c b/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c index d5a5292..f22fa24 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c @@ -490,8 +490,7 @@ int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_table_handler dmar_handler) rc = dmar_handler(dmar_table); xfree(dmar_table); - /* acpi_parse_dmar() zaps APCI DMAR signature in TXT heap table */ - /* but dom0 will read real table, so must zap it there too */ + /* Dom0 will read real DMAR table, so must zap it there */ acpi_dmar_zap(); return rc; diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c index 8c5fa80..ed4c04e 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c @@ -866,8 +866,10 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_dmar(struct acpi_table_header *table) } out: +#ifndef CONFIG_TBOOT /* Zap ACPI DMAR signature to prevent dom0 using vt-d HW. */ acpi_dmar_zap(); +#endif return ret; } -- 1.7.3 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |