[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 29/34] x86/mm: put paging_update_nestedmode under CONFIG_HVM

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 17:28:10 +0100
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:28:16 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:41:49AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.08.18 at 17:12, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Nested HVM is not enabled when !CONFIG_HVM.
> 
> All callers of the function sit under hvm/, so once again I don't see
> why the function needs to remain available with an empty body.

Yes the whole function can be put under CONFIG_HVM.

Wei.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/34] Make CONFIG_HVM work
  - From: Wei Liu
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 29/34] x86/mm: put paging_update_nestedmode under CONFIG_HVM
  - From: Wei Liu
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 29/34] x86/mm: put paging_update_nestedmode under CONFIG_HVM
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 27/34] x86: make hvm_inject_* functions build when !CONFIG_HVM
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 29/34] x86/mm: put paging_update_nestedmode under CONFIG_HVM
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 12/34] x86/pt: only call some functions for HVM guests
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.