Re: [Xen-devel] Dangling whitespaces in xen code

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 29/08/18 18:01, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 29.08.18 19:22, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 29/08/18 17:11, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> During xen hacking I often encounter white spaces at EOLs. It is quite
>>> annoying to see red marker in, say, xen/arch/arm/domctl.c:25
>>>
>>> I used sed to create patch that removes all such whitespaces. Command
>>> is simple:
>>>
>>> # find xen -name "*.[ch]" | xargs sed -i "s/[[:space:]]*$//g"
>>>
>>> Problem is that patch is quite big:
>>>
>>>   285 files changed, 1463 insertions(+), 1463 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> So what is the best way to publish this fix? I can just send it to ML
>>> as one patch. There is no functional changes, so should I add
>>> maintainers?
>>>
>>
>> There are more files than that.  By my count, its:
>>
>>   307 files changed, 1586 insertions(+), 1586 deletions(-)
> I tried to fix only *.c and *.h files. With COPYINGs, READMEs,
> makefiles, and so on I got
>
>  309 files changed, 1599 insertions(+), 1599 deletions(-)
>
>
>> In the past, it has been the view that fixing this all in one go might
>> be too intrusive to people developing series.  Then again, since the
>> last time this was discussed, we've switched from hg to git as a base
>> VCS, and git rebase has no issues coping with trailing whitespace
>> changes.
>
> Also there is --ignore-space-change and --ignore-whitespace, so
> developers and maintainers will be able to rebase changes without much
> effort.
>
>> We've been fixing it as we go, but it is very slow going.  I've got half
>> a mind to suggest that we just commit a single fix and call it done...
> I can't find a better solution. At first I though to fix them manually
> in places where I see them. But then, why should I include fixes for
> some files and not include for others? How to chose which files should
> be fixed and which - not? So, I think it is better to fix all in
> single commit.
>
> Another solution that I can see is to ask maintainers to provide
> patches for own subsystems.

Getting the fix into the tree is trivial, and most easily done by one of
the committers, if the community can agree that its a sensible thing to do.

FWIW, +1 to getting it fixed and removing the problem completely.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel