[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xen/vcpu: Introduce vcpu_destroy()

To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 12:32:42 +0200
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:32:56 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 08:25:33PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Like _domain_destroy(), this will eventually idempotently free all parts of a
> struct vcpu.
> 
> While breaking apart the failure path of vcpu_create(), rework the codeflow to
> be in a line at the end of the function for clarity.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] xen: Improvements to the vcpu create/destroy paths
  - From: Andrew Cooper
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xen/vcpu: Introduce vcpu_destroy()
  - From: Andrew Cooper

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/7] iommu: make use of type-safe DFN and MFN in exported functions
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 127559: regressions - FAIL
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xen/vcpu: Introduce vcpu_destroy()
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 127347: tolerable all pass - PUSHED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.