[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86/HVM: correct hvmemul_map_linear_addr() for multi-page case
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: 13 September 2018 12:39 > To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel <xen- > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] x86/HVM: correct hvmemul_map_linear_addr() for > multi-page case > > >>> On 13.09.18 at 13:06, <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: 13 September 2018 11:13 > >> > >> @@ -544,7 +574,7 @@ static void *hvmemul_map_linear_addr( > >> struct hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt) > >> { > >> struct vcpu *curr = current; > >> - void *err, *mapping; > >> + void *err = ZERO_BLOCK_PTR, *mapping; > > > > Given the revised logic, can't you just start *err with the value > > ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_OKAY) now? You can then lose the extra test in the > first if > > of update_map_err(). > > No, I don't think I can, because of ... > > >> unsigned int nr_frames = ((linear + bytes - !!bytes) >> > PAGE_SHIFT) - > >> (linear >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1; > >> unsigned int i; > >> @@ -600,27 +630,28 @@ static void *hvmemul_map_linear_addr( > >> goto out; > >> > >> case HVMTRANS_bad_gfn_to_mfn: > >> - err = NULL; > >> - goto out; > >> + err = update_map_err(err, NULL); > >> + continue; > >> > >> case HVMTRANS_gfn_paged_out: > >> case HVMTRANS_gfn_shared: > >> - err = ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_RETRY); > >> - goto out; > >> + err = update_map_err(err, ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_RETRY)); > >> + continue; > >> > >> default: > >> - goto unhandleable; > >> + err = update_map_err(err, ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE)); > >> + continue; > >> } > >> > >> *mfn++ = page_to_mfn(page); > >> > >> if ( p2m_is_discard_write(p2mt) ) > >> - { > >> - err = ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_OKAY); > >> - goto out; > >> - } > >> + err = update_map_err(err, ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_OKAY)); > > ... this and ... > > >> } > >> > >> + if ( err != ZERO_BLOCK_PTR ) > >> + goto out; > > ... this. Ah yes. In which case... Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |