[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 14/16] x86: expose CONFIG_HVM
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 02:07:42AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 13.09.18 at 18:01, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:15:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 04.09.18 at 18:15, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > --- > >> > v3: longer text > >> > v2: use tab to indent > >> > > >> > Haven't added a dependency on PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE because agreement is > >> > not yet reached. > >> > >> Hmm, but then I would have expected you to at least do the minimal > >> agreed upon change (modifying that other option's default). Beyond > >> that I'm afraid we're moving towards a dead end here. > >> > > > > I extended the help text to address Andrew's comment. Other than that, I > > didn't see an agreement on "other option's default". What did I miss? > > I don't think there was disagreement on this minimal change (in fact > iirc Andrew explicitly agreed to it [1]). What we can't seem to agree > on is whether to add a "depends on !PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE" to HVM. > > Jan > > [1] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-08/msg02408.html > Oh, then that's more or less what I said in v4 patch. I proposed def_bool y if !PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE in the that patch as a compromise. Wei. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |