Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/18] INSTALL: Mention kconfig

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 08.10.18 at 16:08, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH 10/18] INSTALL: Mention kconfig"):
>> On 05.10.18 at 19:29, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > +silently overriden.  The only way to find which configuration options
>> 
>> Isn't it "overridden", or are both spellings okay?
> 
> It is; I was wrong.
> 
>> > +this varible there is nothing stopping you setting dangerously
>> 
>> variable
> 
> Fixed.
> 
>> Beyond these nits I'm okay with the text now, accepting the anomaly
>> pointed out by Doug.
> 
> Thanks, I'll take that as an ack.  (Assuming you did indeed mean
> `accepting' rather than `excepting'.)

Well, no, it was not meant as an ack, merely as the absence of further
objections. (And yes, I did mean "accepting".)

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel