[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] x86/HVM: implement memory read caching
>>> On 12.10.18 at 15:55, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/09/18 14:10, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Emulation requiring device model assistance uses a form of instruction >> re-execution, assuming that the second (and any further) pass takes >> exactly the same path. This is a valid assumption as far as use of CPU >> registers goes (as those can't change without any other instruction >> executing in between), but is wrong for memory accesses. In particular >> it has been observed that Windows might page out buffers underneath >> an instruction currently under emulation (hitting between two passes). >> If the first pass translated a linear address successfully, any subsequent >> pass needs to do so too, yielding the exact same translation. >> >> Introduce a cache (used just by guest page table accesses for now, i.e. >> a form of "paging structure cache") to make sure above described >> assumption holds. This is a very simplistic implementation for now: Only >> exact matches are satisfied (no overlaps or partial reads or anything). >> >> There's also some seemingly unrelated cleanup here which was found >> desirable on the way. >> >> 1: x86/mm: add optional cache to GLA->GFN translation >> 2: x86/mm: use optional cache in guest_walk_tables() >> 3: x86/HVM: implement memory read caching >> 4: x86/HVM: prefill cache with PDPTEs when possible >> >> "VMX: correct PDPTE load checks" is omitted from v2, as I can't >> currently find enough time to carry out the requested further >> rework. > > Following the x86 call, I've had some thoughts and suggestions about how > to make this work in a reasonable way, without resorting to the full > caching approach. Thanks, but one question before I start thinking about this in more detail: Before writing this, did you read my mail from the 11th? I ask because what you suggest does not look to match the behavior I've described there as what I think it ought to be. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |