[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/efi: Do not insert timestamps in efi files


  • To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Bernhard M. Wiedemann" <bwiedemann@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:49:49 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=bwiedemann@xxxxxxx; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsDiBDa4Do4RBADrHxWZStG7ZjH+EKgROa9ISXQi21wGNSPOA0XiAExp4gotZ7yZJwLL2vkt 71vNDdLoAexG7cU1jq3aK273qGBF4QOzO/OqUmtq3eugIpGR89Fd3gHFTl7ob62iUyu2Rr9p 4PV/BHwjAVJQac9Oa9gUjk2J6/FD0aERZLY3MTbj0QCg/3vFC6whS1SLF9dOM9EeqWXyJY8E ANnSpHRCUBaehuE/p41sozVhvlDcUuI4JQ4QovTQ1YTHSz6yVARoJ2r2cndoVMVgrBCXcCpk gZxirB0Qa7ndYVuqliKSPDmxZCnbPT1P7Guq//VF9+pW6Iaubm9VSL1nnW//ICIOUEfYtbHq kpdVdG8sPzBrry7qfqwhOgch6R2FBADevQvDx3CEEEXONlTMNhgW0EjlWfLuHZAyOfDTWCub iODbcOHw+e/tTljqSeqSHJmp4H/3UADZd6GIy2BMYJX10mlqJYi07f8U17y/GBozPyLzuZd5 eFSpmbaJT6iZ84BAG6PIEXugO31A9hvAANUUzEK/K4rsfVH14af9KaAJLs0pQmVybmhhcmQg V2llZGVtYW5uIDxiZXJuaGFyZHBncEBsc21vZC5kZT7CZAQTEQIAJAIbAwIeAQIXgAULCQgH AwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAUCTRCjzAIZAQAKCRBJNgs7HfuhZALYAJ44WwvIefMXoJPmRyKL0KBc dFzwqgCeKjS50F9gUTUrAuUZdIEu0U4Vvo7Ow00ENrgWshAP/j9XkQQNZPUiUmEa7TnChO+Q UJyAPwvXVtf7E/4haGl7PXae4YtwPAfVYmPnXRhp1F7V4u7p6gWBBrSuSjBZ7KOsDbi9t95U GcKqi24p933bhyVWKml/KwjpKpceNT9fj/FrIA9+khj+1/7E39QR1xNOG/+9ZSchYvo7G1uc 2UEFFkzkeNtFuFqnsgyQB7v5n5+NLbT+Kp3upxbHSgEWMJYJKgQF3KDZYWnUnawTYAJZKuZT c3b4Fn/7EeVaWb1Y5SynvRGdde8K7ZTwKZ0jEynf3sDGMyk+3A0tHrMHTxbR7BEZNoeV6hU8 XBgbI0+oWtdd3E9JxOg2pgKL2uEZdWqP38Fsx10GPq5/Uy5tblprISdF9fC1RliKd3Xy8WHS qCPFNUxaJD+mHtqioIBanC5AzHWVa2+6IrDWToLfgkWs2l5cbKJk3/twJbDCR+Ygd7d3RCAL GxGPWcyDl5UQrtFYiC7cD8V/hphniBGuHwdKTfUQYQQa5FpOP2d5sUjrDFk4L9IaamYKKPFx +cqwYGO6nnhZ2/kJvm+InLHACRIJQVF+HcnlrUOkojikP8TDSrB9iwH0F04U5sF+jYA9cP/3 a1KpF2wTKz5w9ab4nzSj1v4l6U854nKAZRJF8BNiPPr+r+B0aPPxcD0PCnhEDKuN3XALi3Gq ciLKrmREjEwXAAICD/4ilsXL5r9vm0vwLsveVYYehZwGRBTcXQaA/wbtX3Bcp3sAbLiCQy8R 5dQsmNkknB8xWjEIJIroOIwmKDqwu7H6oMunveimyQsf1CPeVMIdyoJv0+dYN4uGwiKZL0Zw 3A/tqvCH/3ZejoAC+dUq31AmrhpbpV/o9XK5YpnNLWVBfSDDuEfTOSDULpB5tr4D6w1sqdcM WPpxINKJUIrs/AiRqFqm4/03ohpWYcQqB4ZVPJlmbt726uzrZetytyhwfv4RX0rL2QXcOs4r QtvCbm28htKCrmGDl928EI4UYNS3nqcmZO40FoTseIJDrfPVh1Q9X07/K7Kzzk7/nHFwuTea XFYZuCzQIGi2X4+cnvA0xVk3Or71s4appvGhVozVE74F0+iDiHzX64zRQlbqW4ktDUI3KZ2g 8pK84UrdQCyCPZYt64rK+dhEnESZSu2OZJTUmh98yVK5uV7TXI/Tvo3Q+8Ox/HCsS5b+LXB9 hnko00fDlGlbzcVjpRgaBIdxx+zwMOzU0KEjZKG4JV06m79Nf/oFRS08RVCxbU77tLoRf9u2 jbbQ83uPtADwaYsxvTZEueWJ61/ve3QDn36Yrq8APgJxvbJySlUQQ20QerHAfUks9bmeCDGY 6CXcrIqMcIY+bpRqe6AogQh/iuDGtjO788S+TcIjmr+TlrEUI89n+8JOBBgRAgAGBQI2uBay ABIJEEk2Czsd+6FkB2VHUEcAAQGf8QCgr7hNwY4kPfDTaVKSNpnx3CzjXjQAn0tHVYa+e7pe z7TXZtbYV+mLAAY5
  • Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:50:01 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Openpgp: preference=signencrypt

On 24/10/2018 10.16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> This change is fine in principle, but do all i386pep compatible versions
> of LD support this parameter?

It seems, it was added in 2014 to GNU binutils when the default was
reversed to be unreproducible:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=eeb14e5a5b378450ca2ed139e76f317f491f4613

Don't know about other ld implementations.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.