[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] xen_disk qdevification
Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:kwolf@xxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 02 November 2018 11:04 >> To: Tim Smith <tim.smith@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx; qemu- >> block@xxxxxxxxxx; Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paul Durrant >> <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>; Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; >> Max Reitz <mreitz@xxxxxxxxxx>; armbru@xxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: xen_disk qdevification (was: [PATCH 0/3] Performance improvements >> for xen_disk v2) >> >> Am 02.11.2018 um 11:00 hat Tim Smith geschrieben: >> > A series of performance improvements for disks using the Xen PV ring. >> > >> > These have had fairly extensive testing. >> > >> > The batching and latency improvements together boost the throughput >> > of small reads and writes by two to six percent (measured using fio >> > in the guest) >> > >> > Avoiding repeated calls to posix_memalign() reduced the dirty heap >> > from 25MB to 5MB in the case of a single datapath process while also >> > improving performance. >> > >> > v2 removes some checkpatch complaints and fixes the CCs >> >> Completely unrelated, but since you're the first person touching >> xen_disk in a while, you're my victim: >> >> At KVM Forum we discussed sending a patch to deprecate xen_disk because >> after all those years, it still hasn't been converted to qdev. Markus is >> currently fixing some other not yet qdevified block device, but after >> that xen_disk will be the only one left. >> >> A while ago, a downstream patch review found out that there are some QMP >> commands that would immediately crash if a xen_disk device were present >> because of the lacking qdevification. This is not the code quality >> standard I envision for QEMU. It's time for non-qdev devices to go. >> >> So if you guys are still interested in the device, could someone please >> finally look into converting it? >> > > I have a patch series to do exactly this. It's somewhat involved as I > need to convert the whole PV backend infrastructure. I will try to > rebase and clean up my series a.s.a.p. Awesome! Please coordinate with Anthony Prerard to avoid duplicating work if you haven't done so already. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |