[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: fix xen_qlock_wait()
- To: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx
- From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 09:53:26 -0500
- Autocrypt: addr=boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFH8CgsBEAC0KiOi9siOvlXatK2xX99e/J3OvApoYWjieVQ9232Eb7GzCWrItCzP8FUV PQg8rMsSd0OzIvvjbEAvaWLlbs8wa3MtVLysHY/DfqRK9Zvr/RgrsYC6ukOB7igy2PGqZd+M MDnSmVzik0sPvB6xPV7QyFsykEgpnHbvdZAUy/vyys8xgT0PVYR5hyvhyf6VIfGuvqIsvJw5 C8+P71CHI+U/IhsKrLrsiYHpAhQkw+Zvyeml6XSi5w4LXDbF+3oholKYCkPwxmGdK8MUIdkM d7iYdKqiP4W6FKQou/lC3jvOceGupEoDV9botSWEIIlKdtm6C4GfL45RD8V4B9iy24JHPlom woVWc0xBZboQguhauQqrBFooHO3roEeM1pxXjLUbDtH4t3SAI3gt4dpSyT3EvzhyNQVVIxj2 FXnIChrYxR6S0ijSqUKO0cAduenhBrpYbz9qFcB/GyxD+ZWY7OgQKHUZMWapx5bHGQ8bUZz2 SfjZwK+GETGhfkvNMf6zXbZkDq4kKB/ywaKvVPodS1Poa44+B9sxbUp1jMfFtlOJ3AYB0WDS Op3d7F2ry20CIf1Ifh0nIxkQPkTX7aX5rI92oZeu5u038dHUu/dO2EcuCjl1eDMGm5PLHDSP 0QUw5xzk1Y8MG1JQ56PtqReO33inBXG63yTIikJmUXFTw6lLJwARAQABzTNCb3JpcyBPc3Ry b3Zza3kgKFdvcmspIDxib3Jpcy5vc3Ryb3Zza3lAb3JhY2xlLmNvbT7CwXgEEwECACIFAlH8 CgsCGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEIredpCGysGyasEP/j5xApopUf4g 9Fl3UxZuBx+oduuw3JHqgbGZ2siA3EA4bKwtKq8eT7ekpApn4c0HA8TWTDtgZtLSV5IdH+9z JimBDrhLkDI3Zsx2CafL4pMJvpUavhc5mEU8myp4dWCuIylHiWG65agvUeFZYK4P33fGqoaS VGx3tsQIAr7MsQxilMfRiTEoYH0WWthhE0YVQzV6kx4wj4yLGYPPBtFqnrapKKC8yFTpgjaK jImqWhU9CSUAXdNEs/oKVR1XlkDpMCFDl88vKAuJwugnixjbPFTVPyoC7+4Bm/FnL3iwlJVE qIGQRspt09r+datFzPqSbp5Fo/9m4JSvgtPp2X2+gIGgLPWp2ft1NXHHVWP19sPgEsEJXSr9 tskM8ScxEkqAUuDs6+x/ISX8wa5Pvmo65drN+JWA8EqKOHQG6LUsUdJolFM2i4Z0k40BnFU/ kjTARjrXW94LwokVy4x+ZYgImrnKWeKac6fMfMwH2aKpCQLlVxdO4qvJkv92SzZz4538az1T m+3ekJAimou89cXwXHCFb5WqJcyjDfdQF857vTn1z4qu7udYCuuV/4xDEhslUq1+GcNDjAhB nNYPzD+SvhWEsrjuXv+fDONdJtmLUpKs4Jtak3smGGhZsqpcNv8nQzUGDQZjuCSmDqW8vn2o hWwveNeRTkxh+2x1Qb3GT46uzsFNBFH8CgsBEADGC/yx5ctcLQlB9hbq7KNqCDyZNoYu1HAB Hal3MuxPfoGKObEktawQPQaSTB5vNlDxKihezLnlT/PKjcXC2R1OjSDinlu5XNGc6mnky03q yymUPyiMtWhBBftezTRxWRslPaFWlg/h/Y1iDuOcklhpr7K1h1jRPCrf1yIoxbIpDbffnuyz kuto4AahRvBU4Js4sU7f/btU+h+e0AcLVzIhTVPIz7PM+Gk2LNzZ3/on4dnEc/qd+ZZFlOQ4 KDN/hPqlwA/YJsKzAPX51L6Vv344pqTm6Z0f9M7YALB/11FO2nBB7zw7HAUYqJeHutCwxm7i BDNt0g9fhviNcJzagqJ1R7aPjtjBoYvKkbwNu5sWDpQ4idnsnck4YT6ctzN4I+6lfkU8zMzC gM2R4qqUXmxFIS4Bee+gnJi0Pc3KcBYBZsDK44FtM//5Cp9DrxRQOh19kNHBlxkmEb8kL/pw XIDcEq8MXzPBbxwHKJ3QRWRe5jPNpf8HCjnZz0XyJV0/4M1JvOua7IZftOttQ6KnM4m6WNIZ 2ydg7dBhDa6iv1oKdL7wdp/rCulVWn8R7+3cRK95SnWiJ0qKDlMbIN8oGMhHdin8cSRYdmHK kTnvSGJNlkis5a+048o0C6jI3LozQYD/W9wq7MvgChgVQw1iEOB4u/3FXDEGulRVko6xCBU4 SQARAQABwsFfBBgBAgAJBQJR/AoLAhsMAAoJEIredpCGysGyfvMQAIywR6jTqix6/fL0Ip8G jpt3uk//QNxGJE3ZkUNLX6N786vnEJvc1beCu6EwqD1ezG9fJKMl7F3SEgpYaiKEcHfoKGdh 30B3Hsq44vOoxR6zxw2B/giADjhmWTP5tWQ9548N4VhIZMYQMQCkdqaueSL+8asp8tBNP+TJ PAIIANYvJaD8xA7sYUXGTzOXDh2THWSvmEWWmzok8er/u6ZKdS1YmZkUy8cfzrll/9hiGCTj u3qcaOM6i/m4hqtvsI1cOORMVwjJF4+IkC5ZBoeRs/xW5zIBdSUoC8L+OCyj5JETWTt40+lu qoqAF/AEGsNZTrwHJYu9rbHH260C0KYCNqmxDdcROUqIzJdzDKOrDmebkEVnxVeLJBIhYZUd t3Iq9hdjpU50TA6sQ3mZxzBdfRgg+vaj2DsJqI5Xla9QGKD+xNT6v14cZuIMZzO7w0DoojM4 ByrabFsOQxGvE0w9Dch2BDSI2Xyk1zjPKxG1VNBQVx3flH37QDWpL2zlJikW29Ws86PHdthh Fm5PY8YtX576DchSP6qJC57/eAAe/9ztZdVAdesQwGb9hZHJc75B+VNm4xrh/PJO6c1THqdQ 19WVJ+7rDx3PhVncGlbAOiiiE3NOFPJ1OQYxPKtpBUukAlOTnkKE6QcA4zckFepUkfmBV1wM Jg6OxFYd01z+a+oL
- Cc: sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 14:54:10 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
On 11/9/18 7:04 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Commit a856531951dc80 ("xen: make xen_qlock_wait() nestable")
> introduced a regression for Xen guests running fully virtualized
> (HVM or PVH mode). The Xen hypervisor wouldn't return from the poll
> hypercall with interrupts disabled in case of an interrupt (for PV
> guests it does).
>
> So instead of disabling interrupts in xen_qlock_wait() use a nesting
> counter to avoid calling xen_clear_irq_pending() in case
> xen_qlock_wait() is nested.
>
> Fixes: a856531951dc80 ("xen: make xen_qlock_wait() nestable")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
This needs Sander's Reported-by.
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
> index 441c88262169..1c8a8816a402 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <linux/log2.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
>
> #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> @@ -21,6 +22,7 @@
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, lock_kicker_irq) = -1;
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char *, irq_name);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_t, xen_qlock_wait_nest);
I'd move this to xen_qlock_wait().
Either way,
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> static bool xen_pvspin = true;
>
> static void xen_qlock_kick(int cpu)
> @@ -39,25 +41,25 @@ static void xen_qlock_kick(int cpu)
> */
> static void xen_qlock_wait(u8 *byte, u8 val)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> int irq = __this_cpu_read(lock_kicker_irq);
> + atomic_t *nest_cnt = this_cpu_ptr(&xen_qlock_wait_nest);
>
> /* If kicker interrupts not initialized yet, just spin */
> if (irq == -1 || in_nmi())
> return;
>
> - /* Guard against reentry. */
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> + /* Detect reentry. */
> + atomic_inc(nest_cnt);
>
> - /* If irq pending already clear it. */
> - if (xen_test_irq_pending(irq)) {
> + /* If irq pending already and no nested call clear it. */
> + if (atomic_read(nest_cnt) == 1 && xen_test_irq_pending(irq)) {
> xen_clear_irq_pending(irq);
> } else if (READ_ONCE(*byte) == val) {
> /* Block until irq becomes pending (or a spurious wakeup) */
> xen_poll_irq(irq);
> }
>
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> + atomic_dec(nest_cnt);
> }
>
> static irqreturn_t dummy_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|