[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/8] xen: Swich parameter in get_page_from_gfn to use typesafe gfn
- To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
- From: Andrii Anisov <andrii.anisov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 18:58:49 +0200
- Cc: kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim \(Xen.org\)" <tim@xxxxxxx>, julie.grall@xxxxxxx, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>, suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, brian.woods@xxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:59:04 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
> What's wrong with including clean-up patch in a series adding a feature?
I do not mean it is wrong.
Just assuming that introducing a new feature and cleaning up a code
might be different processes with a different review period.
Sincerely,
Andrii Anisov.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
