Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V11 4/5] p2m: Always use hostp2m when clipping rangesets

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 20.12.18 at 15:38, <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At the moment I'm only working 4-ish more days between now and the code
> freeze, and we're arguing over whether the comment should say, "We
> should probably do X instead" or "We should probably do Y instead."
> 
> Can we just for now take the text as I proposed it?  You can argue about
> the right thing to do when we do the alleged clean-up.

Oh, and btw - while I see where you're coming from, I don't like
taking an approaching code freeze as an excuse to short circuit
anything, neither reviews nor discussions. In the end it's a
comment only here, but the overall situation is (apparently)
unclear enough that a new misleading comment is not going to
help at all, the more that we all know how intended cleanups
often work out once the main roadblock is out of the way.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel