[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen/dom0: Improve documentation for dom0= and dom0-iommu=
- To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:44:25 +0000
- Autocrypt: addr=andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFLhNn8BEADVhE+Hb8i0GV6mihnnr/uiQQdPF8kUoFzCOPXkf7jQ5sLYeJa0cQi6Penp VtiFYznTairnVsN5J+ujSTIb+OlMSJUWV4opS7WVNnxHbFTPYZVQ3erv7NKc2iVizCRZ2Kxn srM1oPXWRic8BIAdYOKOloF2300SL/bIpeD+x7h3w9B/qez7nOin5NzkxgFoaUeIal12pXSR Q354FKFoy6Vh96gc4VRqte3jw8mPuJQpfws+Pb+swvSf/i1q1+1I4jsRQQh2m6OTADHIqg2E ofTYAEh7R5HfPx0EXoEDMdRjOeKn8+vvkAwhviWXTHlG3R1QkbE5M/oywnZ83udJmi+lxjJ5 YhQ5IzomvJ16H0Bq+TLyVLO/VRksp1VR9HxCzItLNCS8PdpYYz5TC204ViycobYU65WMpzWe LFAGn8jSS25XIpqv0Y9k87dLbctKKA14Ifw2kq5OIVu2FuX+3i446JOa2vpCI9GcjCzi3oHV e00bzYiHMIl0FICrNJU0Kjho8pdo0m2uxkn6SYEpogAy9pnatUlO+erL4LqFUO7GXSdBRbw5 gNt25XTLdSFuZtMxkY3tq8MFss5QnjhehCVPEpE6y9ZjI4XB8ad1G4oBHVGK5LMsvg22PfMJ ISWFSHoF/B5+lHkCKWkFxZ0gZn33ju5n6/FOdEx4B8cMJt+cWwARAQABtClBbmRyZXcgQ29v cGVyIDxhbmRyZXcuY29vcGVyM0BjaXRyaXguY29tPokCOgQTAQgAJAIbAwULCQgHAwUVCgkI CwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAUCWKD95wIZAQAKCRBlw/kGpdefoHbdD/9AIoR3k6fKl+RFiFpyAhvO 59ttDFI7nIAnlYngev2XUR3acFElJATHSDO0ju+hqWqAb8kVijXLops0gOfqt3VPZq9cuHlh IMDquatGLzAadfFx2eQYIYT+FYuMoPZy/aTUazmJIDVxP7L383grjIkn+7tAv+qeDfE+txL4 SAm1UHNvmdfgL2/lcmL3xRh7sub3nJilM93RWX1Pe5LBSDXO45uzCGEdst6uSlzYR/MEr+5Z JQQ32JV64zwvf/aKaagSQSQMYNX9JFgfZ3TKWC1KJQbX5ssoX/5hNLqxMcZV3TN7kU8I3kjK mPec9+1nECOjjJSO/h4P0sBZyIUGfguwzhEeGf4sMCuSEM4xjCnwiBwftR17sr0spYcOpqET ZGcAmyYcNjy6CYadNCnfR40vhhWuCfNCBzWnUW0lFoo12wb0YnzoOLjvfD6OL3JjIUJNOmJy RCsJ5IA/Iz33RhSVRmROu+TztwuThClw63g7+hoyewv7BemKyuU6FTVhjjW+XUWmS/FzknSi dAG+insr0746cTPpSkGl3KAXeWDGJzve7/SBBfyznWCMGaf8E2P1oOdIZRxHgWj0zNr1+ooF /PzgLPiCI4OMUttTlEKChgbUTQ+5o0P080JojqfXwbPAyumbaYcQNiH1/xYbJdOFSiBv9rpt TQTBLzDKXok86LkCDQRS4TZ/ARAAkgqudHsp+hd82UVkvgnlqZjzz2vyrYfz7bkPtXaGb9H4 Rfo7mQsEQavEBdWWjbga6eMnDqtu+FC+qeTGYebToxEyp2lKDSoAsvt8w82tIlP/EbmRbDVn 7bhjBlfRcFjVYw8uVDPptT0TV47vpoCVkTwcyb6OltJrvg/QzV9f07DJswuda1JH3/qvYu0p vjPnYvCq4NsqY2XSdAJ02HrdYPFtNyPEntu1n1KK+gJrstjtw7KsZ4ygXYrsm/oCBiVW/OgU g/XIlGErkrxe4vQvJyVwg6YH653YTX5hLLUEL1NS4TCo47RP+wi6y+TnuAL36UtK/uFyEuPy wwrDVcC4cIFhYSfsO0BumEI65yu7a8aHbGfq2lW251UcoU48Z27ZUUZd2Dr6O/n8poQHbaTd 6bJJSjzGGHZVbRP9UQ3lkmkmc0+XCHmj5WhwNNYjgbbmML7y0fsJT5RgvefAIFfHBg7fTY/i kBEimoUsTEQz+N4hbKwo1hULfVxDJStE4sbPhjbsPCrlXf6W9CxSyQ0qmZ2bXsLQYRj2xqd1 bpA+1o1j2N4/au1R/uSiUFjewJdT/LX1EklKDcQwpk06Af/N7VZtSfEJeRV04unbsKVXWZAk uAJyDDKN99ziC0Wz5kcPyVD1HNf8bgaqGDzrv3TfYjwqayRFcMf7xJaL9xXedMcAEQEAAYkC HwQYAQgACQUCUuE2fwIbDAAKCRBlw/kGpdefoG4XEACD1Qf/er8EA7g23HMxYWd3FXHThrVQ HgiGdk5Yh632vjOm9L4sd/GCEACVQKjsu98e8o3ysitFlznEns5EAAXEbITrgKWXDDUWGYxd pnjj2u+GkVdsOAGk0kxczX6s+VRBhpbBI2PWnOsRJgU2n10PZ3mZD4Xu9kU2IXYmuW+e5KCA vTArRUdCrAtIa1k01sPipPPw6dfxx2e5asy21YOytzxuWFfJTGnVxZZSCyLUO83sh6OZhJkk b9rxL9wPmpN/t2IPaEKoAc0FTQZS36wAMOXkBh24PQ9gaLJvfPKpNzGD8XWR5HHF0NLIJhgg 4ZlEXQ2fVp3XrtocHqhu4UZR4koCijgB8sB7Tb0GCpwK+C4UePdFLfhKyRdSXuvY3AHJd4CP 4JzW0Bzq/WXY3XMOzUTYApGQpnUpdOmuQSfpV9MQO+/jo7r6yPbxT7CwRS5dcQPzUiuHLK9i nvjREdh84qycnx0/6dDroYhp0DFv4udxuAvt1h4wGwTPRQZerSm4xaYegEFusyhbZrI0U9tJ B8WrhBLXDiYlyJT6zOV2yZFuW47VrLsjYnHwn27hmxTC/7tvG3euCklmkn9Sl9IAKFu29RSo d5bD8kMSCYsTqtTfT6W4A3qHGvIDta3ptLYpIAOD2sY3GYq2nf3Bbzx81wZK14JdDDHUX2Rs 6+ahAA==
- Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:44:39 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
On 21/12/2018 12:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.12.18 at 00:40, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown
+++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown
@@ -636,55 +636,76 @@ trace feature is only enabled in debugging builds of Xen.
Specify the bit width of the DMA heap.
-### dom0 (x86)
-> `= List of [ pvh | shadow ]`
+### dom0
+> `= List of [ pvh=<bool>, shadow=<bool> ]`
-> Sub-options:
-
-> `pvh`
+> Applicability: x86
Why the new tag, when everything else uses (x86) next to the
option name?
See the commit message of c/s
a3a99df44e5405d2092ec59087681765fa4cdee7
The problem is with the generated HTML anchors when trying to cross
reference the options.
### dom0-iommu
-> `= List of [ passthrough | strict | map-inclusive ]`
-
-This list of booleans controls the iommu usage by Dom0:
-
-* `passthrough`: disables DMA remapping for Dom0. Default is `false`. Note that
- this option is hard coded to `false` for a PVH Dom0 and any attempt to
- overwrite it from the command line is ignored.
-
-* `strict`: sets up DMA remapping only for the RAM Dom0 actually got assigned.
- Default is `false` which means Dom0 will get mappings for all the host
- RAM except regions in use by Xen. Note that this option is hard coded to
- `true` for a PVH Dom0 and any attempt to overwrite it from the command line
- is ignored.
-
-* `map-inclusive`: sets up DMA remapping for all the non-RAM regions below 4GB
- except for unusable ranges. Use this to work around firmware issues providing
- incorrect RMRR/IVMD entries. Rather than only mapping RAM pages for IOMMU
- accesses for Dom0, with this option all pages up to 4GB, not marked as
- unusable in the E820 table, will get a mapping established. Note that this
- option is only applicable to a PV Dom0 and is enabled by default on Intel
- hardware.
-
-* `map-reserved`: sets up DMA remapping for all the reserved regions in the
- memory map for Dom0. Use this to work around firmware issues providing
- incorrect RMRR/IVMD entries. Rather than only mapping RAM pages for IOMMU
- accesses for Dom0, all memory regions marked as reserved in the memory map
- that don't overlap with any MMIO region from emulated devices will be
- identity mapped. This option maps a subset of the memory that would be
- mapped when using the `map-inclusive` option. This option is available to all
- Dom0 modes and is enabled by default on Intel hardware.
+> `= List of [ passthrough=<bool>, strict=<bool>, map-inclusive=<bool>,
+> map-reserved=<bool> ]`
+
+Controls for the dom0 IOMMU setup.
+
+* The `passthrough` boolean is applicable to x86 PV dom0's only and defaults
+ to false. It controls whether the IOMMU is fully disabled for devices
+ belonging to dom0 (`passthrough=1`), or whether the IOMMU is set up with
+ an identity transform for dom0 (`passthrough=0`) to prevent dom0 from
+ DMA'ing outside of its permitted areas.
+
+ This option is hardwired to false for x86 PVH dom0's (where a non-identity
+ transform is required for dom0 to function), and is ignored for ARM.
+
+* The `strict` boolean is applicable to x86 PV dom0's only and defaults to
+ false. It controls whether dom0 can have IOMMU mappings for all domain
+ RAM in the system, or only for its allocated RAM (and grant mappings etc.)
+
+ This option is hardwired to true for x86 PVH dom0's (as RAM belonging to
+ other domains in the system don't live in a compatible address space), and
+ is ignored for ARM.
+
+* The `map-inclusive` boolean is applicable to x86 PV dom0's, and sets up DMA
+ remapping for all non-RAM regions below 4GB except for unusable ranges.
I don't thinks this is PV-specific, just its default is.
From arch_iommu_hwdom_init():
/* Inclusive mappings are enabled by default for PV. */
if ( iommu_hwdom_inclusive == -1 )
iommu_hwdom_inclusive = is_pv_domain(d);
/* Reserved IOMMU mappings are enabled by default. */
if ( iommu_hwdom_reserved == -1 )
iommu_hwdom_reserved = 1;
if ( iommu_hwdom_inclusive && !is_pv_domain(d) )
{
printk(XENLOG_WARNING
"IOMMU inclusive mappings are only supported on PV Dom0\n");
iommu_hwdom_inclusive = 0;
}
Attempting to use this option with a PVH dom0 will cause Xen to
force it off.
~Andrew
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|