[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Command line options of dubious use

To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 17:56:43 +0100
Cc: Xen-devel List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 16:57:08 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Mon, Dec 31, Andrew Cooper wrote:

> * tbuf_size and tevt_mask
> Given that xentrace can set them at runtime, and it is debugging
> functionality, I don't see a plausible use the command line options at all.

'tbuf_size=-1 dom0_mem=N' collects events during boot.
xenalyze is (or was) unable to properly parse the result, but thats a
separate issue.

Olaf

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Command line options of dubious use
  - From: Andrew Cooper

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] pvcalls fixes
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 131690: regressions - FAIL
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] pvcalls fixes
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Command line options of dubious use
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.