[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] iommu: specify page_count rather than page_order to iommu_map/unmap()...
>>> On 18.01.19 at 17:03, <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ...and remove alignment assertions. > > Testing shows that certain callers of iommu_legacy_map/unmap() specify > order > 0 ranges that are not order aligned thus causing one of the > IS_ALIGNED() assertions to fire. As said before - without a much better explanation of why the current order-based model is unsuitable (so far I've been provided only vague pointers into "somewhere in PVH Dom0 boot code" iirc) to understand why it's undesirable to simply make those call sites obey to the current requirements, I'm not happy to see us go this route. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |