[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] virtio_ring: check dma_mem for xen_domain
Hi stefano, > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 2019年1月24日 7:44 > To: hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; Peng Fan > <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>; mst@xxxxxxxxxx; jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx; > xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-remoteproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > luto@xxxxxxxxxx; jgross@xxxxxxxx; boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx; > bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx; jliang@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] virtio_ring: check dma_mem for xen_domain > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 01:04:33PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > If vring_use_dma_api is actually supposed to return true when > > > dma_dev->dma_mem is set, then both Peng's patch and the patch I > > > wrote are not fixing the real issue here. > > > > > > I don't know enough about remoteproc to know where the problem > > > actually lies though. > > > > The problem is the following: > > > > Devices can declare a specific memory region that they want to use > > when the driver calls dma_alloc_coherent for the device, this is done > > using the shared-dma-pool DT attribute, which comes in two variants > > that would be a little to much to explain here. > > > > remoteproc makes use of that because apparently the device can only > > communicate using that region. But it then feeds back memory obtained > > with dma_alloc_coherent into the virtio code. For that it calls > > vmalloc_to_page on the dma_alloc_coherent, which is a huge no-go for > > the ĐMA API and only worked accidentally on a few platform, and > > apparently arm64 just changed a few internals that made it stop > > working for remoteproc. > > > > The right answer is to not use the DMA API to allocate memory from a > > device-speficic region, but to tie the driver directly into the DT > > reserved memory API in a way that allows it to easilt obtain a struct > > device for it. > > If I understand correctly, Peng should be able to reproduce the problem on > native Linux without any Xen involvement simply by forcing > vring_use_dma_api to return true. Peng, can you confirm? It is another issue without xen involvement, There is an thread talking this: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10742923/ Without xen, vring_use_dma_api will return false. With xen, if vring_use_dma_api returns true, it will dma_map_xx and trigger dump. Thanks, Peng. > > And the right fix is not to call vmalloc_to_page on a dma_alloc_coherent > buffer -- I don't know about the recent changes on arm64, but that's not going > to work with arm32 either AFAIK. Given that I don't have a repro, I'll leave > it to > Peng and/or others to send the appropriate patch for remoteproc. > > > > This is orthogonal to another issue, and that is that hardware virtio > > devices really always need to use the DMA API, otherwise we'll bypass > > such features as the device specific DMA pools, DMA offsets, cache > > flushing, etc, etc. > > I understand, I'll drop my patch. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |