[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 06/21] memblock: memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(): don't panic
- To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:45:02 +0000
- Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>, Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-c6x-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kasan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Salter <msalter@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matt Turner <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, uclinux-h8-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Greentime Hu <green.hu@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stafford Horne <shorne@xxxxxxxxx>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Paul Burton <paul.burton@xxxxxxxx>, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, openrisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:45:22 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:03:53AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> index ae34e3a..2c61ea4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> @@ -237,6 +237,10 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64
> start_pfn, u64 end_pfn)
> pr_info("Initmem setup node %d [<memory-less node>]\n", nid);
>
> nd_pa = memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid);
> + if (!nd_pa)
> + panic("Cannot allocate %zu bytes for node %d data\n",
> + nd_size, nid);
> +
> nd = __va(nd_pa);
>
> /* report and initialize */
Does it mean that memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid() never returns valid
physical memory starting at 0?
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
