[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] x86/vtd: Drop struct qi_ctrl
>>> On 25.02.19 at 11:02, <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 22 February 2019 19:13 >> >> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c >> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c >> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int __must_check >> queue_invalidate_context_sync(struct vtd_iommu *iommu, >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->register_lock, flags); >> index = qinval_next_index(iommu); >> - entry_base = iommu_qi_ctrl(iommu)->qinval_maddr + >> + entry_base = iommu->qinval_maddr + >> ((index >> QINVAL_ENTRY_ORDER) << PAGE_SHIFT); > > ^ This calculation looks worthy of a macro or an inline. It is repeated a > lot. And indeed the other day I was surprised that there is GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(), but no qinval equivalent. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |