[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-next] xen/arm: irq: Don't use _IRQ_PENDING when handling host interrupt
Hi, Gentle ping. Cheers, On 1/28/19 3:59 PM, Julien Grall wrote: While SPIs are shared between CPU, it is not possible to receive the same interrupts on a different CPU while the interrupt is in active state. The deactivation of the interrupt is done at the end of the handling. This means the _IRQ_PENDING logic is unecessary on Arm as a same interrupt can never come up while in the loop. So remove it to simplify the interrupt handle code. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/irq.c | 32 ++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c index c51cf333ce..3877657a52 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c @@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ int request_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int irqflags, void do_IRQ(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, unsigned int irq, int is_fiq) { struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); + struct irqaction *action;perfc_incr(irqs); @@ -242,35 +243,22 @@ void do_IRQ(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, unsigned int irq, int is_fiq)goto out_no_end; }- set_bit(_IRQ_PENDING, &desc->status);- - /* - * Since we set PENDING, if another processor is handling a different - * instance of this same irq, the other processor will take care of it. - */ - if ( test_bit(_IRQ_DISABLED, &desc->status) || - test_bit(_IRQ_INPROGRESS, &desc->status) ) + if ( test_bit(_IRQ_DISABLED, &desc->status) ) goto out;set_bit(_IRQ_INPROGRESS, &desc->status); - while ( test_bit(_IRQ_PENDING, &desc->status) )- { - struct irqaction *action; + action = desc->action;- clear_bit(_IRQ_PENDING, &desc->status);- action = desc->action; + spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);- spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);- - do - { - action->handler(irq, action->dev_id, regs); - action = action->next; - } while ( action ); + do + { + action->handler(irq, action->dev_id, regs); + action = action->next; + } while ( action );- spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);- } + spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);clear_bit(_IRQ_INPROGRESS, &desc->status); -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |