[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86/sysctl: Clean up XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_hotplug
>>> On 03.04.19 at 11:06, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/04/2019 09:53, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 02.04.19 at 21:57, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c >>> @@ -137,27 +137,35 @@ long arch_do_sysctl( >>> case XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_hotplug: >>> { >>> unsigned int cpu = sysctl->u.cpu_hotplug.cpu; >>> + bool plug; >>> + long (*fn)(void *) = NULL; >>> + void *hcpu = NULL; >> May I ask that you consistently initialize (or not) all three new >> variables you introduce? > > I noticed this while posting. Not would allow the compiler to notice > when fn wasn't selected, but hvcpu is going to end up with an > initialiser by the next patch. Right, I've noticed the need for hcpu to stay as is while looking at patch 3. Before you remove the other initializer, though - are you sure you don't need to instead add one, for older gcc to not choke? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |