Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 31/55] efi: add emacs block to boot.c

[Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 09:14:41PM +0000, Nuernberger, Stefan wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 16:44 +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  xen/common/efi/boot.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/xen/common/efi/boot.c b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> > index 1d1420f02c..3868293d06 100644
> > --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> > @@ -1705,3 +1705,13 @@ void __init efi_init_memory(void)
> >  #endif
> >  }
> >  #endif
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Local variables:
> > + * mode: C
> > + * c-file-style: "BSD"
> > + * c-basic-offset: 4
> > + * tab-width: 4
> > + * indent-tabs-mode: nil
> > + * End:
> > + */
> 
> Not relevant to the patch series. What's the upstream position on these
> changes? Should they be introduced in separate 'cleanup' series or is
> it common to include that as part of unrelated functional change
> series? I personally don't mind either way. (And same applies to the
> other emacs block commit in the series, of course.)
> 

I normally do cleanups as I change existing code to avoid too much code
churn in one go.

Wei.

> - Stefan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
> Krausenstr. 38
> 10117 Berlin
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Schlaeger, Ralf Herbrich
> Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879
> Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel