[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] debianhvm tests: Re-permute guest architecture
- To: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:59:30 +0200
- Autocrypt: addr=jgross@xxxxxxxx; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFOMcBYBCACgGjqjoGvbEouQZw/ToiBg9W98AlM2QHV+iNHsEs7kxWhKMjrioyspZKOB ycWxw3ie3j9uvg9EOB3aN4xiTv4qbnGiTr3oJhkB1gsb6ToJQZ8uxGq2kaV2KL9650I1SJve dYm8Of8Zd621lSmoKOwlNClALZNew72NjJLEzTalU1OdT7/i1TXkH09XSSI8mEQ/ouNcMvIJ NwQpd369y9bfIhWUiVXEK7MlRgUG6MvIj6Y3Am/BBLUVbDa4+gmzDC9ezlZkTZG2t14zWPvx XP3FAp2pkW0xqG7/377qptDmrk42GlSKN4z76ELnLxussxc7I2hx18NUcbP8+uty4bMxABEB AAG0H0p1ZXJnZW4gR3Jvc3MgPGpncm9zc0BzdXNlLmNvbT6JATkEEwECACMFAlOMcK8CGwMH CwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRCw3p3WKL8TL8eZB/9G0juS/kDY9LhEXseh mE9U+iA1VsLhgDqVbsOtZ/S14LRFHczNd/Lqkn7souCSoyWsBs3/wO+OjPvxf7m+Ef+sMtr0 G5lCWEWa9wa0IXx5HRPW/ScL+e4AVUbL7rurYMfwCzco+7TfjhMEOkC+va5gzi1KrErgNRHH kg3PhlnRY0Udyqx++UYkAsN4TQuEhNN32MvN0Np3WlBJOgKcuXpIElmMM5f1BBzJSKBkW0Jc Wy3h2Wy912vHKpPV/Xv7ZwVJ27v7KcuZcErtptDevAljxJtE7aJG6WiBzm+v9EswyWxwMCIO RoVBYuiocc51872tRGywc03xaQydB+9R7BHPuQENBFOMcBYBCADLMfoA44MwGOB9YT1V4KCy vAfd7E0BTfaAurbG+Olacciz3yd09QOmejFZC6AnoykydyvTFLAWYcSCdISMr88COmmCbJzn sHAogjexXiif6ANUUlHpjxlHCCcELmZUzomNDnEOTxZFeWMTFF9Rf2k2F0Tl4E5kmsNGgtSa aMO0rNZoOEiD/7UfPP3dfh8JCQ1VtUUsQtT1sxos8Eb/HmriJhnaTZ7Hp3jtgTVkV0ybpgFg w6WMaRkrBh17mV0z2ajjmabB7SJxcouSkR0hcpNl4oM74d2/VqoW4BxxxOD1FcNCObCELfIS auZx+XT6s+CE7Qi/c44ibBMR7hyjdzWbABEBAAGJAR8EGAECAAkFAlOMcBYCGwwACgkQsN6d 1ii/Ey9D+Af/WFr3q+bg/8v5tCknCtn92d5lyYTBNt7xgWzDZX8G6/pngzKyWfedArllp0Pn fgIXtMNV+3t8Li1Tg843EXkP7+2+CQ98MB8XvvPLYAfW8nNDV85TyVgWlldNcgdv7nn1Sq8g HwB2BHdIAkYce3hEoDQXt/mKlgEGsLpzJcnLKimtPXQQy9TxUaLBe9PInPd+Ohix0XOlY+Uk QFEx50Ki3rSDl2Zt2tnkNYKUCvTJq7jvOlaPd6d/W0tZqpyy7KVay+K4aMobDsodB3dvEAs6 ScCnh03dDAFgIq5nsB11j3KPKdVoPlfucX2c7kGNH+LUMbzqV6beIENfNexkOfxHf4kBrQQY AQgAIBYhBIUSZ3Lo9gSUpdCX97DendYovxMvBQJa3fDQAhsCAIEJELDendYovxMvdiAEGRYI AB0WIQRTLbB6QfY48x44uB6AXGG7T9hjvgUCWt3w0AAKCRCAXGG7T9hjvk2LAP99B/9FenK/ 1lfifxQmsoOrjbZtzCS6OKxPqOLHaY47BgEAqKKn36YAPpbk09d2GTVetoQJwiylx/Z9/mQI CUbQMg1pNQf9EjA1bNcMbnzJCgt0P9Q9wWCLwZa01SnQWFz8Z4HEaKldie+5bHBL5CzVBrLv 81tqX+/j95llpazzCXZW2sdNL3r8gXqrajSox7LR2rYDGdltAhQuISd2BHrbkQVEWD4hs7iV 1KQHe2uwXbKlguKPhk5ubZxqwsg/uIHw0qZDk+d0vxjTtO2JD5Jv/CeDgaBX4Emgp0NYs8IC UIyKXBtnzwiNv4cX9qKlz2Gyq9b+GdcLYZqMlIBjdCz0yJvgeb3WPNsCOanvbjelDhskx9gd 6YUUFFqgsLtrKpCNyy203a58g2WosU9k9H+LcheS37Ph2vMVTISMszW9W8gyORSgmw==
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:59:38 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
On 17/04/2019 12:08, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Firstly, change the smoke flight to use amd64, not i386.
> Secondly, make the other flights have a mixture of i386 and amd64, not
> just amd64.
>
> It was always wrong to test only one guest architecture in the main
> flights.
>
> The context for changing the smoke flight is that there seems to be a
> problem affecting Debian i386 guests. This is rather a nuisance but
> it is not a Xen regression so we probably want to do an amd64 guest
> instead so we have some HVM tests in the smoke flights.
>
> Checked with standalone-generate-dump-flight-runvars. Differences
> are as follows:
>
> 1. Generally, to change the guest arch from amd64 to i386 in:
>
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-{amd64,i386}-xsm
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-{amd64,i386}-xsm
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-{amd64,i386}-xsm
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-{amd64,i386}-xsm
>
> This occurs in all the usual flights.
>
> 2. To change the guest arch from i386 to amd64 in:
>
> xen-unstable-smoke test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386
>
> In all cases, this implies a variety of changes to runvars, including
> the ISO to be used, the install timeout, etc.
>
> Usually I would introduce new jobs first, and then, after an overlap,
> remove old ones. But the regression, due to the i386 hvm stretch
> problem, is already with us.
>
> I expect this change to unblock the xen-unstable-smoke flights by
> dropping the failing job and replacing it with a passing one.
>
> The other flights will now start to fail, though. I will need,
> separately, to develop a workaround for the stretch i386 hvm guest
> bug.
>
> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
