[Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/20] xen/arm: processor: Use _BITUL instead of _AC(1, U) in SCTLR_ defines

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

The newly introduced macro _BITUL makes the code more readable.

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
---
 xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
index c6f56490b3..1a143fb6a3 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
@@ -115,20 +115,20 @@
 
 /* Bits specific to SCTLR_EL1 for Arm32 */
 
-#define SCTLR_A32_EL1_V     (_AC(1,U)<<13)
+#define SCTLR_A32_EL1_V     _BITUL(13)
 
 /* Common bits for SCTLR_ELx for Arm32 */
 
-#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_TE    (_AC(1,U)<<30)
-#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_FI    (_AC(1,U)<<21)
+#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_TE    _BITUL(30)
+#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_FI    _BITUL(21)
 
 /* Common bits for SCTLR_ELx on all architectures */
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_EE    (_AC(1,U)<<25)
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_WXN   (_AC(1,U)<<19)
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_I     (_AC(1,U)<<12)
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_C     (_AC(1,U)<<2)
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_A     (_AC(1,U)<<1)
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_M     (_AC(1,U)<<0)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_EE    _BITUL(25)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_WXN   _BITUL(19)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_I     _BITUL(12)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_C     _BITUL(2)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_A     _BITUL(1)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_M     _BITUL(0)
 
 #define HSCTLR_BASE     _AC(0x30c51878,U)
 
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel