Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

[Steven Haigh <netwiz@xxxxxxxxx>]

(and sending to the list this time due to Geary being rather 
featureless mail client)
As one of those being caught by regressions upgrading F29 to F30 under 
Xen DomU's, I think this is a bad idea.
It shows that it wasn't tested, because it doesn't work. To me, this 
exposes weaknesses in the testing and the solution shouldn't be "The 
check fails, remove the check".
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 4:18 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 
<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:22:13PM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> >  Yup +1 from my side too. Xen is hardly tested since a lot of time.
> Hi!
>
> And that is thanks to one of the GRUB2 bugs that needs some love
> from Peter Jones.
>
> As without that bug being fixed - it is very difficult to test it - 
> as you can't even load Xen!
> I've asked the upstream GRUB maintainer to sheed some light on the
> confusion about multiboot2 + SecureBoot - hopefully that will resolve
> the question.
>
> My vote is to have it remain as is.
>
> Thank you.
> >  On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:07 PM Geoffrey Marr <gmarr@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> > wrote:
> >  > Since F24, I haven't seen or heard of anyone who uses Xen over KVM
> >  > anywhere other than this thread... I'm +1 for making this test an
> >  > "Optional" one.
> >  >
> >  > Geoff Marr
> >  > IRC: coremodule
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:33 AM Adam Williamson <
> >  > adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  >
> >  >> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 13:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >  >> > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 15:59 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >  >> > > > > I would prefer for it to remain as it is.
> >  >> > > >
> >  >> > > > This is only practical if it's going to be tested, and 
> > tested
> >  >> regularly
> >  >> > > > - not *only* on the final release candidate, right before 
> > we sign
> >  >> off
> >  >> > > > on the release. It needs to be tested regularly throughout 
> > the
> >  >> release
> >  >> > > > cycle, on the composes that are "nominated for testing".
> >  >> > >
> >  >> > > Right, which is why I am happy that you have pointed me to 
> > the right
> >  >> > > place so I can be up-to-date.
> >  >> >
> >  >> > Great, thanks. So let's leave it as it is for now, but we'll 
> > keep an
> >  >> > eye on this during F27 cycle. If we get to, say, Beta and 
> > there are no
> >  >> > results for the test, that's gonna be a problem. Thanks!
> >  >>
> >  >> So, for Fedora 30, this was not tested throughout the whole 
> > cycle. I
> >  >> think we can consider the proposal to remove the criterion active
> >  >> again.
> >  >> --
> >  >> Adam Williamson
> >  >> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> >  >> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT 
> > happyassassin . net
> >  >> http://www.happyassassin.net
> >  >> _______________________________________________
> >  >> test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  >> To unsubscribe send an email to 
> > test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  >> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> >  >> List Guidelines: 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >  >> List Archives:
> >  >> 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  >>
> >  > _______________________________________________
> >  > test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  > To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> >  > List Guidelines: 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >  > List Archives:
> >  > 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  >
> >
> >
> >  --
> >  //sumantro
> >  Fedora QE
> >  TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED 
> > <https://redhat.com/trusted>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel