[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [livepatch-build-tools part2 3/6] create-diff-object: Add is_special_section() helper function
On 4/16/19 1:07 PM, Pawel Wieczorkiewicz wrote: This function determines, based on the given section name, if the sections belongs to the special sections category. It treats a name from the special_sections array as a prefix. Any sections whose name starts with special section prefix is considered a special section. Signed-off-by: Pawel Wieczorkiewicz <wipawel@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andra-Irina Paraschiv <andraprs@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Bjoern Doebel <doebel@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Norbert Manthey <nmanthey@xxxxxxxxx> --- common.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ common.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/common.c b/common.c index c968299..a2c860b 100644 --- a/common.c +++ b/common.c @@ -290,6 +290,29 @@ int is_referenced_section(const struct section *sec, const struct kpatch_elf *ke return false; }+int is_special_section(struct section *sec) const for the parameter? +{ + static struct special_section_names { + const char *name; + } names[] = { + { .name = ".bug_frames" }, + { .name = ".fixup" }, + { .name = ".ex_table" }, + { .name = ".altinstructions" }, + { .name = ".altinstr_replacement" }, + { .name = ".livepatch.hooks" }, + { .name = NULL }, + }; + struct special_section_names *special; Wouldn't it be better to reuse the existing special_sections array rather than partially duplicating it here? + + for (special = names; special->name; special++) { + if (!strncmp(sec->name, special->name, strlen(special->name))) + return true; This check is not as precise as it could be, since ".altinstructionsfoo" would be considered special when it actually means nothing to this tool. -- Ross Lagerwall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |