[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [VMI] Possible race-condition in altp2m APIs


  • To: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 19:00:16 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFLhNn8BEADVhE+Hb8i0GV6mihnnr/uiQQdPF8kUoFzCOPXkf7jQ5sLYeJa0cQi6Penp VtiFYznTairnVsN5J+ujSTIb+OlMSJUWV4opS7WVNnxHbFTPYZVQ3erv7NKc2iVizCRZ2Kxn srM1oPXWRic8BIAdYOKOloF2300SL/bIpeD+x7h3w9B/qez7nOin5NzkxgFoaUeIal12pXSR Q354FKFoy6Vh96gc4VRqte3jw8mPuJQpfws+Pb+swvSf/i1q1+1I4jsRQQh2m6OTADHIqg2E ofTYAEh7R5HfPx0EXoEDMdRjOeKn8+vvkAwhviWXTHlG3R1QkbE5M/oywnZ83udJmi+lxjJ5 YhQ5IzomvJ16H0Bq+TLyVLO/VRksp1VR9HxCzItLNCS8PdpYYz5TC204ViycobYU65WMpzWe LFAGn8jSS25XIpqv0Y9k87dLbctKKA14Ifw2kq5OIVu2FuX+3i446JOa2vpCI9GcjCzi3oHV e00bzYiHMIl0FICrNJU0Kjho8pdo0m2uxkn6SYEpogAy9pnatUlO+erL4LqFUO7GXSdBRbw5 gNt25XTLdSFuZtMxkY3tq8MFss5QnjhehCVPEpE6y9ZjI4XB8ad1G4oBHVGK5LMsvg22PfMJ ISWFSHoF/B5+lHkCKWkFxZ0gZn33ju5n6/FOdEx4B8cMJt+cWwARAQABtClBbmRyZXcgQ29v cGVyIDxhbmRyZXcuY29vcGVyM0BjaXRyaXguY29tPokCOgQTAQgAJAIbAwULCQgHAwUVCgkI CwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAUCWKD95wIZAQAKCRBlw/kGpdefoHbdD/9AIoR3k6fKl+RFiFpyAhvO 59ttDFI7nIAnlYngev2XUR3acFElJATHSDO0ju+hqWqAb8kVijXLops0gOfqt3VPZq9cuHlh IMDquatGLzAadfFx2eQYIYT+FYuMoPZy/aTUazmJIDVxP7L383grjIkn+7tAv+qeDfE+txL4 SAm1UHNvmdfgL2/lcmL3xRh7sub3nJilM93RWX1Pe5LBSDXO45uzCGEdst6uSlzYR/MEr+5Z JQQ32JV64zwvf/aKaagSQSQMYNX9JFgfZ3TKWC1KJQbX5ssoX/5hNLqxMcZV3TN7kU8I3kjK mPec9+1nECOjjJSO/h4P0sBZyIUGfguwzhEeGf4sMCuSEM4xjCnwiBwftR17sr0spYcOpqET ZGcAmyYcNjy6CYadNCnfR40vhhWuCfNCBzWnUW0lFoo12wb0YnzoOLjvfD6OL3JjIUJNOmJy RCsJ5IA/Iz33RhSVRmROu+TztwuThClw63g7+hoyewv7BemKyuU6FTVhjjW+XUWmS/FzknSi dAG+insr0746cTPpSkGl3KAXeWDGJzve7/SBBfyznWCMGaf8E2P1oOdIZRxHgWj0zNr1+ooF /PzgLPiCI4OMUttTlEKChgbUTQ+5o0P080JojqfXwbPAyumbaYcQNiH1/xYbJdOFSiBv9rpt TQTBLzDKXok86LkCDQRS4TZ/ARAAkgqudHsp+hd82UVkvgnlqZjzz2vyrYfz7bkPtXaGb9H4 Rfo7mQsEQavEBdWWjbga6eMnDqtu+FC+qeTGYebToxEyp2lKDSoAsvt8w82tIlP/EbmRbDVn 7bhjBlfRcFjVYw8uVDPptT0TV47vpoCVkTwcyb6OltJrvg/QzV9f07DJswuda1JH3/qvYu0p vjPnYvCq4NsqY2XSdAJ02HrdYPFtNyPEntu1n1KK+gJrstjtw7KsZ4ygXYrsm/oCBiVW/OgU g/XIlGErkrxe4vQvJyVwg6YH653YTX5hLLUEL1NS4TCo47RP+wi6y+TnuAL36UtK/uFyEuPy wwrDVcC4cIFhYSfsO0BumEI65yu7a8aHbGfq2lW251UcoU48Z27ZUUZd2Dr6O/n8poQHbaTd 6bJJSjzGGHZVbRP9UQ3lkmkmc0+XCHmj5WhwNNYjgbbmML7y0fsJT5RgvefAIFfHBg7fTY/i kBEimoUsTEQz+N4hbKwo1hULfVxDJStE4sbPhjbsPCrlXf6W9CxSyQ0qmZ2bXsLQYRj2xqd1 bpA+1o1j2N4/au1R/uSiUFjewJdT/LX1EklKDcQwpk06Af/N7VZtSfEJeRV04unbsKVXWZAk uAJyDDKN99ziC0Wz5kcPyVD1HNf8bgaqGDzrv3TfYjwqayRFcMf7xJaL9xXedMcAEQEAAYkC HwQYAQgACQUCUuE2fwIbDAAKCRBlw/kGpdefoG4XEACD1Qf/er8EA7g23HMxYWd3FXHThrVQ HgiGdk5Yh632vjOm9L4sd/GCEACVQKjsu98e8o3ysitFlznEns5EAAXEbITrgKWXDDUWGYxd pnjj2u+GkVdsOAGk0kxczX6s+VRBhpbBI2PWnOsRJgU2n10PZ3mZD4Xu9kU2IXYmuW+e5KCA vTArRUdCrAtIa1k01sPipPPw6dfxx2e5asy21YOytzxuWFfJTGnVxZZSCyLUO83sh6OZhJkk b9rxL9wPmpN/t2IPaEKoAc0FTQZS36wAMOXkBh24PQ9gaLJvfPKpNzGD8XWR5HHF0NLIJhgg 4ZlEXQ2fVp3XrtocHqhu4UZR4koCijgB8sB7Tb0GCpwK+C4UePdFLfhKyRdSXuvY3AHJd4CP 4JzW0Bzq/WXY3XMOzUTYApGQpnUpdOmuQSfpV9MQO+/jo7r6yPbxT7CwRS5dcQPzUiuHLK9i nvjREdh84qycnx0/6dDroYhp0DFv4udxuAvt1h4wGwTPRQZerSm4xaYegEFusyhbZrI0U9tJ B8WrhBLXDiYlyJT6zOV2yZFuW47VrLsjYnHwn27hmxTC/7tvG3euCklmkn9Sl9IAKFu29RSo d5bD8kMSCYsTqtTfT6W4A3qHGvIDta3ptLYpIAOD2sY3GYq2nf3Bbzx81wZK14JdDDHUX2Rs 6+ahAA==
  • Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mathieu Tarral <mathieu.tarral@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 09 May 2019 18:00:29 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Openpgp: preference=signencrypt

On 09/05/2019 18:46, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>> On 09/05/2019 17:19, Mathieu Tarral wrote:
>>> Le mardi, mai 7, 2019 2:01 PM, Mathieu Tarral 
>>> <mathieu.tarral@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>>
>>>>> Given how many EPT flushing bugs I've already found in this area, I 
>>>>> wouldn't be surprised if there are further ones lurking.  If it is an EPT 
>>>>> flushing bug, this delta should make it go away, but it will come with a 
>>>>> hefty perf hit.
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>>> index 283eb7b..019333d 100644
>>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>>> @@ -4285,9 +4285,7 @@ bool vmx_vmenter_helper(const struct cpu_user_regs 
>>>>> *regs)
>>>>>              }
>>>>>          }
>>>>>
>>>>> -        if ( inv )
>>>>> -            __invept(inv == 1 ? INVEPT_SINGLE_CONTEXT : 
>>>>> INVEPT_ALL_CONTEXT,
>>>>> -                     inv == 1 ? single->eptp          : 0);
>>>>> +        __invept(INVEPT_ALL_CONTEXT, 0);
>>>>>      }
>>>>>
>>>>>   out:
>>>> I can give this a try, and see if it resolves the problem !
>>> Just tested, on Xen 4.12.0, and the bug is still here.
>>> Windows 7 is having BSODs with 4 VCPUs.
>>> I didn't noticed a hefty performance impact though.
>>>
>>> Do we have other caches to invalidate ?
>>> Something else that i should test ?
>>>
>>> I don't feel comfortable digging into Xen's code, especially for something 
>>> as complicated as page table and memory management,
>>> increased by the complexity of altp2m.
>>> What i can do however, is test your ideas and patches and report the 
>>> information I can gather on this issue.
>>>
>>> Note: I tested with the latest commits on Drakvuf/master, especially:
>>> "Add a VM pause for shadow copy refresh operation"
>>> https://github.com/tklengyel/drakvuf/pull/626
>>>
>>> @tamas, did you made this patch to fix these kind of race conditions issue 
>>> that i'm reporting ?
>>> Or was it totally unrelated ?
>> With the above change in place and BSODs still happening, I'm fairly
>> convinced that it not a TLB flushing issue.
>>
>> Therefore, the conclusion to draw is that it is a logical bug somewhere.
> I agree.
>
>> First of all - ensure you are using up-to-date microcode.  The number of
>> errata which have been discovered by people associated with the Xen
>> community is large.
>>
>> The microcode is available from
>> https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files/ and
>> https://andrewcoop-xen.readthedocs.io/en/latest/admin-guide/microcode-loading.html
>> is some documentation I prepared earlier.
>>
>> Beyond that, I think it would help to know exactly how libvmi is
>> manipulating the guest.
> I already suggested to Mathieu to try to reproduce the issue using the
> xen-access test tool that's in the Xen tree to cut out all that
> complexity.

xen-access is ok, but I've never encountered a situation where I haven't
had to modify it first to get it usable.

I have some plans to replace it with something far more usable, as part
of tying together some XTF-based VMI testing, but none of that is
remotely ready yet.

> Without being able to limit the scope of the bug and being
> able to reproducible trigger it I see little chance of finding the
> root cause. Unfortunately I don't have the time to do that myself.

I can probably help out with some suggestions, but I agree that we are
going to have to cut out some of the complexity here to figure out
exactly what is going on.

Alternatively, if there are some sufficiently detailed instructions for
how to put together a repro of the problem using libvmi/etc, I might be
able to start debugging from that, but I definitely don't have time to
do that in the next week.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.