[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] pci: use pci_sbdf_t in pci_dev
>>> On 10.05.19 at 18:16, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/05/2019 17:10, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmsi.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmsi.c >> @@ -688,8 +688,8 @@ static int vpci_msi_update(const struct pci_dev *pdev, >> uint32_t data, >> { >> gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR, >> "%04x:%02x:%02x.%u: failed to bind PIRQ %u: %d\n", >> - pdev->seg, pdev->bus, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn), >> - PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn), pirq + i, rc); >> + pdev->sbdf.seg, pdev->sbdf.bus, pdev->sbdf.dev, >> + pdev->sbdf.func, pirq + i, rc); > > A pci_sbdf_t is 32 bits wide. I do actually have a custom %p formatter > from a year or so ago, which simplifies code like this substantially. > > Is there any interest in dusting off that patch and folding it into this > cleanup series? ISTR it also came with several corrections to existing > SBDF rendering. Afaic: Yes please! The one thing I'm not sure about is whether this should be PCI-specific, or whether it wouldn't better be a more general device thing. But I guess we use SBDF also independent of struct pci_dev. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |