[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] how to disable build of pv-shim?
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 03:52:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.05.19 at 11:23, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:55:18AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > >> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:28:12PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > >> > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 05:20:05PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > >> > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:53:21PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > >> > > > What is the recommended way to disable CONFIG_PV_SHIM, which is set > >> > > > in > >> > > > tools/firmware/Makefile? From my understanding there is no way to > > influence > >> > > > its value from outside, which means the build always enters xen-dir/. > >> > > > >> > > I think the following should do the trick. > >> > > > >> > > Let me know if that works for you and I will submit it formally. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks! > >> > > > >> > > ---8<--- > >> > > diff --git a/config/Tools.mk.in b/config/Tools.mk.in > >> > > index 98245f63c9..84ddb1a542 100644 > >> > > --- a/config/Tools.mk.in > >> > > +++ b/config/Tools.mk.in > >> > > @@ -75,3 +75,5 @@ TINFO_LIBS := @TINFO_LIBS@ > >> > > ARGP_LDFLAGS := @argp_ldflags@ > >> > > > >> > > FILE_OFFSET_BITS := @FILE_OFFSET_BITS@ > >> > > + > >> > > +CONFIG_PV_SHIM := @pvshim@ > >> > > diff --git a/tools/configure.ac b/tools/configure.ac > >> > > index c9fd69ddfa..8df2fd604b 100644 > >> > > --- a/tools/configure.ac > >> > > +++ b/tools/configure.ac > >> > > @@ -492,4 +492,15 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE([9pfs], > >> > > > >> > > AC_SUBST(ninepfs) > >> > > > >> > > +AC_ARG_ENABLE([pvshim], > >> > > + AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-pvshim], [Disable pvshim build (x86 > >> > > only, enabled by default)]), > >> > > + [AS_IF([test "x$enable_pvshim" = "xno"], [pvshim=n], > >> > > [pvshim=y])], [ > >> > > + case "$host_cpu" in > >> > > + i[[3456]]86|x86_64) > >> > > + pvshim="y";; > >> > > >> > Since xen doesn't build on 32bit anymore you may want to exclude > >> > i[3456]86 here? > >> > >> Oh, I didn't realize this. Is it true for all distros? > > > > FAOD I was thinking about 32bit xen support. But I just realise since > > you tested host_cpu here, maybe you intended to do a cross-build? > > If the intention is a cross build, then host CPU shouldn't matter at > all, i.e. building e.g. on Arm should work as well. > > When considering the target CPU, implying a 64-bit hypervisor from > a 32-bit general (i.e. tool stack) target would of course be an option. > Question just is how you would determine whether a suitable cross > tool chain is available. I think it would better to use target_cpu here, but limiting to x86_64 only seems wrong, since a user could build a 32bit toolstack and have a 64bit pvshim. I'm not sure however if there are other issues that would prevent this from working out of the box. Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |