[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] x86/hvm: Generic instruction re-execution mechanism for execute faults
On 5/13/19 5:15 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: On 5/13/19 5:06 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:On 13.05.19 at 15:58, <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 11/27/18 12:49 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:With a sufficiently complete insn emulator, single-stepping should not be needed at all imo. Granted we're not quite there yet with the emulator, but we've made quite a bit of progress. As before, if there are particular instructions you know of that the emulator doesn't handle yet, please keep pointing these out. Last I know were some AVX move instructions, which have long been implemented.True, I haven't seen emulator issues in that respect with staging - theemulator appears lately to be sufficiently complete. Thank you very muchfor your help and support - we'll definitely point out unsupported instructions if we spot some again.We've come accross a new instruction that the emulator can't handle in Xen 4.13-unstable today: vpmaddwd xmm4,xmm4,XMMWORD PTR ds:0x513fbb20 Perhaps there are plans for this to go into the emulator as well?You're kidding? This is already in 4.12.0, and if it weren't I'm sure you're aware there are about 40 more AVX512 patches pending review.Right, I did indeed forget about the pending review part, for some reason I was sure they made it in. I've double-checked and we really are using 4.13-unstable - but we've also made changes to the emulator, working on the send-vm-events-from-the-emulator patch, so we'll revert to a pristine staging and retry, there's a chance this happens because of our changes.We'll find out what's going on exactly. I promised I'd return with more details. After some debugging, it certainly looks like the emulator returns UNIMPLEMENTED (5): Mem event emulation failed (5): d5v0 32bit @ 001b:6d96efff -> c5 f9 f5 05 c0 be ad 6d c5 e1 fe 1d a0 20 af 6d Looking at the source code, the emulator does appear to support vpmaddwd, however only for EVEX: http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c;h=032995ea586aa7dd90a1953b6ded656436652049;hb=refs/heads/staging#l6696 whereas our fail case uses VEX.This may be in the works in the aforementioned series, but is legitimately unsupported in 4.13 staging. Thanks, Razvan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |