[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] iommu / x86: move call to scan_pci_devices() out of vendor code
>>> On 14.05.19 at 18:13, <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 13 May 2019 08:36 >> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Brian Woods <brian.woods@xxxxxxx>; Suravee Suthikulpanit > <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>; Andrew >> Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>; >> Wei > Liu >> <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>; Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel > <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] iommu / x86: move call to scan_pci_devices() out of > vendor code >> >> >>> On 08.05.19 at 15:24, <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > It's not vendor specific so it shouldn't really be there. >> >> Perhaps, but this needs better justification: >> >> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c >> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c >> > @@ -2372,10 +2372,6 @@ static int __init vtd_setup(void) >> > P(iommu_hap_pt_share, "Shared EPT tables"); >> > #undef P >> > >> > - ret = scan_pci_devices(); >> > - if ( ret ) >> > - goto error; >> > - >> > ret = init_vtd_hw(); >> >> Even after some looking around, it's not obvious to me that the latter >> call doesn't depend on PCI devices being known, more specifically >> segment 0's bus2bridge[] having been filled. Nor can I tell whether >> there would be some noticeable misbehavior (prior to any guests >> starting) if there was a dependency and it got broken by the re- >> ordering. > > I don't see any dependency but the code is somewhat tangled. Perhaps it > would be better to build the PCI topology *before* IOMMU init and then > iterate over the the devices after init to do the group assignment. I > certainly can't see anything in the scan as it stands that would need the > IOMMU to have been initialized. Ah, yes, that's likely a better model. As to the dependency aspect: pci_add_device() calls iommu_add_device(). But oddly enough _scan_pci_devices() calls alloc_pdev(), not pci_add_device(). So indeed there doesn't look to be any dependency at present. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |