Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: fix regression introduced in 5c883cf036cf

From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 11:00:01 +0100

Authentication-results: esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxx; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Delivery-date: Thu, 16 May 2019 10:00:47 +0000

Ironport-sdr: U6Okfe0+PrdmvkyE2Kbtvdk+GEaeoA6IJHJwOc0nsoQ1iAeMXgy8LK2iPLorhhBqAMu/CAI52w jmw/sI2aDfDwd0zPh2FMTzlaMQO4JEW014W/mBGzHCF7f/NWYwXnTspFKQz1ITQiVZjYyTsfya 7rzxZ4N8gQ/39vKyD9KBdAJX7s0VYd/u1K4IVJDfJNaF9rJFQ/exAHJPH+fggJpkLNU3rRBCgR maagUDYIfvmRjnkmgTCssmLA1521md34jtBlCPofKgC+SrE5svakaJkf3U40ml9kP4JmfKCuvw jLY=

List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

Wei Liu writes ("[PATCH] libxl: fix regression introduced in 5c883cf036cf"): > Two lines were erroneously deleted during rebase which caused domain > destruction to fail. I have taken this as a sign that I should have properly reviewed what became 5c883cf036cf. Having done so I have also spotted that: The newly introduced ERROR_FAIL returns in libxl should be ERROR_NI ("not implemented"). But I didn't see anything else, other than the rebase error that you are fixing now. So for this patch: Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.