[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/6] osstest: use a locally built pkg repository for FreeBSD
Roger Pau Monne writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/6] osstest: use a locally built pkg repository for FreeBSD"): > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:06:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I realise this is a bit late to be saying this, but had you > > considered making the packages build a different step in the same > > job ? That might make a lot of this go away... > > Do you mean to build the packages in build-prep instead of relying on > having a custom binary repository? No. Maybe I am confused. I thought your usual flight was 1 install anointed freebsd 2 build this freebsd 3+ build this package repo 4 install this freebsd (from step 2) 5 rebuild this freebsd (for testing that the build didn't break) 6 rebuild this package repo (") 7+ install this package repoo 8+ build xen My question is why 2/3 and 5/6 are different jobs. If you made 2+3 a single job (with 2 and 3 being separate steps) then there would only need to be a single anointment. > IIRC the package building job takes a non-trivial amount of time (2-3h > IIRC), because it has to build gcc (for SeaBIOS) and python, perl... You could make the package building job optional if you only want to do it some of the time. > > > + # refkey: freebsd job: build-<arch>-freebsd > > > + # refkey: freebsd-packages job: build-<arch>-freebsd-packages > > > + anoint="$anoint \"$anointed\" $flight \ > > > + build-$freebsd_arch-$freebsd_name" > > > > Maybe use an array variable for anount, and then you can avoid the > > shell \" quoting. > > Please bear with me, but can you elaborate on this? Roughly, anoint=() .... anoint+=("$anointed" $flight build-..) ... ./mg-anoint "${anoint[@]}" Note that the \" \" construct has gone, because there is now no additional layer of shell dequoting. > > There seems like a lot of repetition here. For example, FREEBSD_DIST > > overrides FreeBSDDist but /$arch is appended in two places. Maybe > > ${FREEBSD_DIST- ... something ... } would be better ? > > OK, let me try to remove some of the duplication here. Thanks. Another suggestion I mentioned IRL which I wanted to write down was: maybe have mg-anoint have a reporting mode where it prints something suitable for shell `eval'. > > This feels very similar to the code above, although it lacks the > > special handling for the version. > > Maybe I can see about factoring some of this into a helper, but there > are slight differences in both if branches that I'm not sure can be > factored out. Mmmm. > Why I don't start by fixing the repetition of: > freebsd_runvars="$freebsd_runvars \... and we take it from there? Sure, let's see what you come up with. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |