[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH 1/2] core-parking: interact with runtime SMT-disabling
>>> On 12.04.19 at 13:41, wrote: >>>> On 11.04.19 at 21:06, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 11/04/2019 13:45, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> When disabling SMT at runtime, secondary threads should no longer be > >> candidates for bringing back up in response to _PUD ACPI events. Purge > >> them from the tracking array. > >> > >> Doing so involves adding locking to guard accounting data in the core > >> parking code. While adding the declaration for the lock take the liberty > >> to drop two unnecessary forward function declarations. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > > > > I can certainly appreciate these arguments, but surely the converse is > > true. When SMT-enable is used, the newly-onlined threads are now > > eligible to be parked. > > And nothing will keep them from getting parked. > > > At the moment, this looks asymetric. > > It does, but that's a result of core_parking.c only recording CPUs > it has parked, not ones it could park. Did my responses address your concerns? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |