Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: rename tiny64.conf to tiny64_defconfig

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 11.06.19 at 11:27, <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> 
> On 6/11/19 7:43 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 10.06.19 at 22:03, <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 6/5/19 5:01 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>    > On 05/06/2019 16:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> Julien,
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 16.05.19 at 15:37, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> As build system now supports *_defconfig rules it is good to be able
>>>>>> to configure minimal XEN image with
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    make tiny64_defconfig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> command.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> you had objections here, and the first patch makes little sense
>>>>> without the 2nd. May I ask what the verdict is, i.e. whether I should
>>>>> drop these two from my list of pending patches?
>>>>
>>>> Volodymyr was going to resend the series with documentation (as a
>>>> separate patch). But I would be happy to take #1 and #2 assuming that
>>>> documentation patch is going to be sent.
>>>>
>>>> You can consider this as an acked:
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> for the two patches.
>>>
>>> I was about to apply the two patches, but I don't seem to be able to
>>> apply it because some lines contains =20. AFAICT, it is in replacement
>>> of "space" in certain case.
>> 
>> Well, independent of any formatting issues you ought to have trouble
>> applying them since I did so already.
> 
> Hmm, I missed that. Sorry for noise.
> 
> Out of interest, how did you manage to apply it with the =20 in the patch?

There are no =20 in the mail that I did receive.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel