[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: rename tiny64.conf to tiny64_defconfig



Hi,

On 6/12/19 8:44 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.06.19 at 20:52, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Julien Grall writes:
Volodymyr was going to resend the series with documentation (as a
separate patch). But I would be happy to take #1 and #2 assuming that
documentation patch is going to be sent.

Yes, sorry for the delay. I'm going to send resend the series soon. But
I can see, that first two patches are already in the staging branch.
Should I resend the whole series in this case? Or single patch with the
missing documentation will be sufficient?

You should never send patches that have already been applied.

And another, slightly related question: I'm not sure what to do with my
patch to get_maintainer.pl script. Should I resend the new version? Jan
had comments only to commit message...

Well, re-sending may make it easier, but first of all you need to
get a maintainer to ack the patch. My Perl isn't good enough
that I would feel qualified to give mine.

Volodymyr, please resend the patch with Jan's comments addressed. I had a brief looked today and the patch looks correct. I will have another look on the next version.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.